Reinventing Education for the 21st Century (Designing School 2.0)
As Thomas Friedman persuasively argued in this book "The World is Flat," we live in a very different and rapidly changing economic and cultural environment. Schools need to change to prepare students for the dynamic opportunities of the 21st century workforce. Collaboration in most of our schools today is still called "cheating." Our factory model of transmission-based education must be transformed into one where learners regularly collaborate, access and "remix" digital information, and extend their learning beyond the traditional bell schedule. One to one laptop initiatives, where every student and teacher have wireless computing devices; schools and libraries becoming community learning hubs offering public wireless and wired connectivity to the Internet; and the deregulation of education which frees learners to spend time in real-world, problem-based and project-based learning need to become hallmarks of education in the 21st century. This presentation shares this vision for reinventing education: Designing School 2.0, and offers suggestions for how civic leaders can move toward this vision at local levels.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (12)
Destacado
Destacado (20)
Similar a Reinventing Education for the 21st Century (Designing School 2.0)
Similar a Reinventing Education for the 21st Century (Designing School 2.0) (20)
Más de Wesley Fryer
Más de Wesley Fryer (20)
Último
Último (20)
Reinventing Education for the 21st Century (Designing School 2.0)
- 1. Reinventing Education for the 21st Century (Designing School 2.0) by Wesley Fryer handouts.wesfryer.com/ohio speedofcreativity.org 2 February 2009 1
- 2. thank you 2
- 3. 3
- 4. <backchannel> 4
- 5. 5
- 6. http://tinyurl.com/ etechohio 6
- 8. 8
- 9. <goals> 9
- 10. <1> enthrall <2> engage <3> entertain 10
- 11. 11
- 12. <video> 12
- 14. accomodating transformative 14
- 15. 15
- 16. 16
- 19. 19
- 20. <video> 20
- 22. <respond> 22
- 25. connected lives 25
- 26. 26
- 27. May 2008 27
- 28. 28
- 29. http://voicethread.com 29
- 32. 32
- 33. 33
- 34. so what? 34
- 35. 35
- 37. best school for your kids? 37
- 38. 38
- 39. 39
- 40. and that means? 40
- 41. 41
- 42. www.skillscommission.org 42
- 43. 43
- 44. common technologies 44
- 48. 48
- 51. www.edtechactionnetwork.org 51
- 52. 52
- 53. quot;As for enhanced efficiency in learning and teaching, there have been no advances (measured by higher academic achievement of urban, suburban, or rural students) over the last decade that can be confidently attributed to broader access to computers. No surprise here, as the debate over whether new technologies have increased overall American economic productivity also has had no clear answers. The link between test score improvements and computer availability and use is even more contested.quot; Dr Larry Cuban. Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press. 2003. ISBN: 0674011090. pages 178-179. 53
- 54. 54
- 55. quot;...the billions schools have spent on computers have had little effect on how teachers and students learn... The reason for this disappointing result is that the way schools have employed computers has been perfectly predictable, perfectly logical-- and perfectly wrong. As we show in this chapter, schools have crammed them into classrooms to sustain and marginally improve the way they already teach and run their schools, just as most organizations do when they attempt to implement innovations, including computers. Using computers this way will never allow schools to migrate to a student- centric classroom.quot; Christensen, Horn & Johnson. Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. McGraw Hill. 2008. Pages 72-73. 55
- 56. 132 pages www.tcer.org/research/etxtip/ 56
- 57. www.edtechactionnetwork.org 57
- 58. 58
- 60. #1 challenge at school? 60
- 62. how do you cover it all? 62
- 64. <video> 64
- 65. 65
- 66. 66
- 68. ridiculous? 68
- 70. quot;While not abandoning core fundamentals, many NMS educators have slimmed down their curricular expectations over time, choosing instead to identify the most critical outcomes, which are drilled down at the expense of breadth. By utilizing a variety of web tools to focus on students as content producers for an authentic audience and building collaboration between learners, many teachers engage students in an information-rich learning experience.quot; Students as Content Producers: 1-to-1 Laptop program at Nashwaaksis Middle School: Participating in the design and delivery of curriculum 12 Jan 2009 By Jeff Whipple, Technology Learning Mentor Nashwaaksis Middle School, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. www.aalf.org/Issues/view.aspx?id=23 70
- 72. what is school 2.0? 72
- 73. not a single model 73
- 75. what shall we do? 75
- 76. primacy of relationships 76
- 78. blend learning 78
- 81. empower time & place shifting 81
- 83. flip lecture & homework 83
- 85. <video> 85
- 87. what shall we do? 87
- 90. 16 Oct 2008 90
- 92. 92
- 93. collaborate 93
- 94. 94
- 96. get creative! 96
- 97. www.scottmcleod.net/oklahoma 97
- 98. www.stateofcreativity.com 98
- 99. “digital video certified” 99
- 100. http://celebrateoklahoma.us/ 100
- 101. http://celebrateoklahoma.us/ 101
- 102. <video> 102
- 103. http://celebrateoklahoma.us/ 103
- 104. 104
- 105. who makes change? 105
- 107. Reinventing Education for the 21st Century (Designing School 2.0) by Wesley Fryer handouts.wesfryer.com/ohio speedofcreativity.org 2 February 2009 107