Sunx4450 Intel7460 GigaSpaces XAP Platform Benchmark

1. Ultra-Scalable and Blazing-Fast: The Sun Fire x4450-Intel 7460-XAP GigaSpaces Platform Scaling up with Commodity HW® Scale up Benchmark Report Shay Hassidim Deputy CTO GigaSpaces January 2009

7. Servers Used Since we are running Scale up Benchmark we have fixed amount of machines - mySQL Database - Apache Load-Balancer 3.16GHz 4 2 (2 cores each) Intel Xeon 16 G RAM Sun Fire X4150 2 socket Sun 4 GigaSpaces Clients 2.66GHz 24 4 (6 cores each) Intel Dunnington X7460 32 G RAM 4 socket Intel White box 3 GigaSpaces 2.66GHz 24 4 (6 cores each) Intel Dunnington X7460 32 G RAM Sun Fire X4450 4 socket Sun 2 GigaSpaces 2.66GHz 24 4 (6 cores each) Intel Dunnington X7460 32 G RAM Sun Fire X4450 4 socket Sun 1 Running Clock speed # of Cores # of CPU CPU Type and Memory Model Vendor Server ID

8. Technology Stack under Test Ethernet (1gE) Sun Fire x4450 Intel Dunnington X7460 4 CPUs (6 cores each) Sun Solaris update 6 GigaSpaces XAP 6.2.2 Sun mySQL 5 Apache LB 2.2.9 Sun JDK 1.6

11. Scale up Benchmark Goals – Measuring Performance Scalability Latency

13. SBA vs .TBA – Scaling vs. Latency and Costs SBA – Space Based Architecture TBA – Traditional Based Architecture

15. Quick Introduction to GigaSpaces

17. Introduction - Space Basic Operations

19. Introduction Space Based Architecture – Business logic and data collocated Primary 1 Primary 2 Primary 3 Backup 3 Backup 2 Backup 1 Replication Replication Replication Pushing data into the backend system In-Memory-Data-Grid and collocated Processing units Collects results / reporting Service

21. Scale up Throughput Benchmark

23. Scale up Throughput Benchmark – Embedded mode 20% drop up to 16 threads hitting the system with 1.5 M read/sec 1.8 Million read sec! 1.1 Million write/take sec!

24. Scale up Throughput Benchmark – Remote mode 20% drop up to 24 users hitting the system with 65,000 red/sec 90,00 read sec! 45,00 write/take sec!

28. Scale up Latency Benchmark– Physical Deployment Topology white box Client X4450 GigaSpaces 4 spaces , one per GSC X4450 GigaSpaces 4 spaces , one per GSC Switched Ethernet LAN

29. Scale up Latency Benchmark Less than 20% drop up to 20 users hitting the system with 20,000 write/sec

31. Web Application Benchmark

33. Architecture – Step 1- Request Submission Get request and invoke Service Data Grid Step 1 - Latency

34. Architecture – Step 2- Retrieve Results Page Generation Data Grid Latency measured: Step 1 + 2 Step 2 - Latency

35. Web Application Benchmark – Physical Deployment Topology X4150 Apache Load Balancer mySQL X4450 GigaSpaces 4 spaces Web servers ,Services X4450 GigaSpaces 4 spaces Web servers ,Services Switched Ethernet LAN white box Client JMeter Switched Ethernet LAN

36. Web Application Benchmark Results – Latency , Scalability Only 20% drop up to 20 users hitting the system with 7000 requests/sec having 2.8 ms latency

37. Web Application Benchmark Results - Capacity The Users factor is 50 - Every LAN based user equals 50s WAN based users due-to the inherit latency of the internet (Min latency over the WAN 100ms , over the LAN 2ms)

40. Risk Calculation Benchmark Workers Data-Grid Submit Calculation Request

41. Risk Calculation Benchmark – Physical Deployment Topology X4450 GigaSpaces spaces Workers ,Services X4450 GigaSpaces spaces Workers ,Services X4150 Client Switched Ethernet LAN White box GigaSpaces spaces Workers ,Services

42. Risk Calculation Benchmark Results – Calc Time , Scalability Less than 20% drop up to 32 workers

47. Comparison of 6 with 4 Core CPU (16 vs. 24 cores) Embedded mode 20% difference with 16 threads 300,000 extra read oper/sec with 24 cores! 180,000 extra write/take oper/sec with 24 cores!

48. Comparing 6 core CPU with 4 Core CPU (16 vs. 24 cores) Embedded mode Better throughput with 24 cores Better Scalability with 24 cores – 24-29% better

49. Comparing 6 core CPU with 4 Core CPU (16 vs. 24 cores) Remote mode ~30% difference with 24 threads 10,000 extra read oper/sec with 24 cores! 20,000 extra write/take oper/sec with 24 cores!

50. Comparing 6 core CPU with 4 Core CPU (16 vs. 24 cores) Remote mode Better throughput with 24 cores Better Scalability with 24 cores 12-33 % better