SUMMARY OF WRITINGS Medical Research A, B and C, WITH A MINOR CORRECTION IN INTERPRETATION OF ANATOMY. Still the case stands, because surgery on the right half side of the brain, after making a hole at the left side, was performed without patient conscent and kept hidden after. RX manipulation tot frustrate the investigation after is also as finding supporting the case. THE CASE STILL STANDS in spite of counyter-actions. What is there more to be found? Thank you Slideshare for your democratic tool!

1. ERATA
Lectori Salutem. Over all these years there was one mistake in interpretation mine of
anatomy, recently one doctor who was juridical allowed to speak, pointed me to at that fact.
I had been mistaking the left Side-Brain-Ventricle for the Cisterna Magna. Mistake or not,
proving illegal medical activities nevertheless still stands as one doctor already mentioned,
while he was not allowed to mention what those errors were. Officially there was only to cut
in the Cisterna Maga at the left side of the head, but scan images show hidden deeds. And
the X-ray manipulations were also not done just for fun too: there is something to conceal!
The first specialist who was supporting me, ten years ago, I saw her repeatedly ticking with a pen on
the real spot of the Cisterna Magna, not allowed mentioning my mistake; she was by professional
obligation to protect the image of profession first by silence. As another doctor who had studied all
my writings in 2013 remarked, that there are some errors in my script (which is nearly a scientific
publication anyhow), but you’re not a neurologist, and this indeed is a case. He asked me not publish
any more findings, to allow building up the case further in silence. Thus explaining my silence after.
One thing is to add in conclusion on my study about the professional obligation not to speak: while
investigating the illegal medical activities was going, with support of a few doctors, they appeared
not to be allowed to speak about my error of anatomic interpretation. Underneath is an abridged
overview of findings, which are to be found to in the foregoing writings Medical Research A.B and C.
There are some findings to be added, but those we keep that for the judge now first, but they will
become open, because the obligation of silence should not be used to conceal blamable activities.
Before the surgeries: white arrow points to Falx-Cerebelli; black arrow = after: cyst has passed Falx-C
.
The white horizontal arrow is the
real direction of actual surgery in
the Falx Cerebelli cutting the Sinus
Rectus. The white arrow downward
at the left image is the official
direction of surgery as reported.
Cutting in the Falx Cerebelli was 1st
,
followed by other hidden actions.
Sinus
Rectus

2. So I had confused the Cisterna Magna with the Large Side-Brain-Ventricles. But for the case in itself
this does not differ, because -either performing surgery forward inside or downward inside on the
left side- in spite surgery was performed just over the middle at the right side in the head going
underneath the skull after making a hole at the left side. This performance is not by accident because
then also a hole over the middle of the skull was made. (Regarding that anatomy interpretation-
error: Actually my medical dictionary was not that clear on that point and I had picked the wrong
brain-fluid chamber, taking for being the largest. In all those years I was visiting physicians, nobody
did correct me on that point, that I was mistaking the left side-ventricle for the Cisterna Magna.)
Note: it is said that a surgeon can decide at any time to change aspects to treat a patient. But there
was no emergency at that moment to act without patient consent, and the patient could have been
informed afterwards too, but first of all in arguments, also if so, then when decided a hole made at
the right side would simplifying surgery. Therefore this is first evidence of hidden medical activities.
A huge scar in the neck for a minor surgery right under the scull, with several body foreign parts in
the neck to be found after? Seen the specialists remained silent when I started questioning, I started
to study myself on the scans for understanding. This was also a learning process without teacher.
The blood-vain being hit indeed was the Vene Sinus Rectus, after cutting into the Falx Cerebelli.
Body-Foreign
material ?
Missing
Sinus
Rectus ?
Ferro traces going from neck to vertebral

3. Dia Sana and MRI are comparable matching scans.
(The indication of two surgeries one after the other fits with what I heard when at the intesive care.)
There is also foreign-body material to be found inside the head at the skull basis, which did not sink
down. In order to define the location; therefore this scan-comparing with the size and location of the
venes and the shape of the head. Three matching scan images made this approx comparing possible.
If there was nothing to hide from activities in the neck, why then X-ray manipulation is performed?
Two surgeries one after another?
Enlargement from the MRI scout- scan November
2007. Sinus transversus not functioning? Sinus Rectus
is more times cut off. Foreign material inside the head.

4. These are signs of manipulation in the productions process with double negatives copied through as
RX photography is similar to regular photography, also regarding the negatives-production-process.
Double nametag is a sign of manipulation of negatives in production with double prints.
ZHS1S ZHS2S
The Kodak RX brand information is running away, and some brand information is mirrored on ZHS2S.
So again I had confused the Cisterna Magna with the Large Side-Brain-Ventricles. But if this mistake
of interpretation of anatomy was used to keep the whole case down with that minor argument, then
a finding of secondary offending is too. Frustration of the process of justice would not be needed, if
there was nothing to prove. So in spite of that single error, implicitly there is recognition of proof.
In Medical investigation part C I explained the impossibility a vain clip sagging down from inside the
head towards inside the Spinal Canal, ending up even in between the second and third vertebral.
Beware: Army Instruction! Check and question yourself and others, and keep each other sharp.
Never give up; it is better dying with a bullet in the belly then in the back. Be warned, be prepared.
Next to a different
position of the clip and
reaching even outside
the vertebral body;
ZHS1S shows a messy
Posterior Arch and a
C2 Pocessus Spinoza in
comparison with
ZHS2S, all being signs
of a manipulation.
There is very little space in the
Spinal Canal between the layers
of membranes and the nerve
cord wrapped within. / Sagging
down through the Arachnoid
membrane is most unlikely.
Questioning sagging down, but
if so why RX manipulations after
Arachnoid
?