Slidecast on interaction and collaboration in a web-based learning environment

1. A qualitative meta-analysis of interactions and collaboration in a web-based learning environment Submitted by Mamoona Brace 6610 Module 3

3. Identification of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

4. Identification of 15 studies on the theme

5. Synthesis of studies.

9. Methods (Context/Education/Participants)

10. Framework

11. Findings

12. Conclusions

13. Discussion

17. Frameworks

19. Methods of Studies

20. Table 1

21. Table 2

22. Table 3

23. Table 4

24. Table 5

25. Table 6

26. Findings of the Studies

31. Conclusions of the studies

34. Implications of the Studies

37. Discussion of Findings

40. Conclusions

43. Limitations of Meta-Analysis

45. Implications of Meta-analysis

47. References Brindley, J., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L (2009). Creating effective collaboration learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/675/1271 Bouzidi, L., & Jaillet, A.(2009).Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 257-268. Heift,T., & Caws, C. (2000). Peer feedback in synchronous writing environments: A case study in French. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3). Ikpeze, C. (2007). Small group collaboration in peer-led electronic discourse: An analysis of group dynamics and interactions involving preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 383-407. Lazonder, A. (2005). Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviourand search outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 465-475.

48. References 6. Li, L., Steckelberg, A., & Srinivasan, S. (2009). Utilizing peer interactions to promote learning through a web- based peer assessment system. Canadian Journal Of Learning And Technology / La Revue CanadienneDe L’ApprentissageEt De La Technologie, 34(2). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/497/228 7. Liu, E. F., & Lin, S.(2007) Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1122- 1125. 8. Maher, M., & Jacob,E. (2006). Peer computer conferencing to support teachers' reflection during action research. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 127-150. 9. O Murchu, D., & Sorensen, E. (2004). Online master communities of practice: collaborative learning in an intercultural perspective. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 1. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Identifying_COPs.html

49. References 10. Poellhuber, B., Chomienne, M., & Karsenti, T. (2008). The effect of peer collaboration and collaborative learning on self-efficacy and persistence in a learner-paced continuous intake model. The Journal Of Distance Education / Revue De L'ÉDucation à Distance, 22(3). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/451 11. Seo, K.K. (2007). Utilizing peer moderating in online discussions: addressing the controversy between teacher moderation and nonmoderation. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 21-36. 12. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69. 13. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), January 2005. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/index.htm 14. Trautmann, N. (2009).Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports. Education Technology Research and Development, 57, 685-704.

50. References 15. Tsai,C.C., Lin,S., Yuan, S.M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252. 16. Tseng,S., Tsai, C.C.(2007) On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49, 1161–1174. 17. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 18. Yu, F., Liu, Y., & Chan, T. (2005). A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 42(4), 337-348.