SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
高齢者への
薬剤投与の注意点
高齢者への投薬
                          Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121




•   高齢者(≥65歳)では慢性疾患が多く, 内服している薬剤も多い

    •   米国では≥65歳の12%が10種類以上, 23%が5種類以上の薬剤が処方.
        市販薬(OTC)も含めるともっと多くなる.

    •   若年と比較し, 3倍以上の薬剤使用量となる.
薬物動態の変化
                               Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445




•   薬物動態は, 吸収, 分布, 代謝, 排泄の4つで規定される.

•   吸収; 加齢に伴い消化管蠕動, 血流は低下する.
     胃酸の分泌も低下し, 胃内のpHは上昇する.

    •   血流低下, pH上昇により, 経口摂取された薬剤の吸収率は低下.

    •   一方で, 蠕動運動の低下は消化管通過時間が延長するため,
        吸収率は上昇し, 血中濃度ピークまでの時間も延長.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121

•   分布容積の変化; 高齢者の体格, 組成の変化

    •   高齢者では, 体重, Total body water(TBW)は低下し,
        相対的に脂質の割合は増加. >65yでは毎年0.5%体重低下する.

    •   例えば80kgの75歳では体脂肪率29%, 一方で20歳の場合は15%のみ
                                                               Med Clin N Am 95 (2011) 579–593

    •    → Hydrophilic drugs(親水性の薬剤)の分布容積は低下する.
          親水性薬剤であるジゴキシンやリチウム,
          エタノールは同じ量でも血中濃度が増加する.
         → Lipophilic drugs(脂質溶解性の薬剤)は脂肪組織へ分布し,
          Vdは増加するものの蓄積による効果遷延のリスクが上昇
          (ベンゾジアゼピン系)

•   分布; アルブミン値の低下

    •   アルブミン結合性の薬剤では遊離体の増加を来たし, 作用が増強
        (フェニトイン, テオフィリン, ワーファリン, ジゴキシン)
体格に応じた薬剤調節

•   例えば, 90kg, 190cmの患者は,
    56kg, 150cmの患者と比較して約2倍の体積を有する.

    •   熱病では決まった投与量のみ記載されているが,
        日本人との対格差, 近年の肥満患者の増加に対応できていない

    •   肥満患者と非肥満患者では薬剤の吸収率に差はないが,
        タンパク結合率, 分布体積は肥満患者で大きい.

    •   また, 肥満患者では肝代謝が亢進する傾向にある

                                    Lancet 2010;375:248-51
Hydrophilic(親水性)   Lipophilic(親脂質性)
                      βラクタム系             キノロン
                       ペニシリン, セフェム,      マクロライド
                       モノバクタム, カルバペネム    Lincosamides

                      グリコペプチド            テトラサイクリン
                      アミノグリコシド           チゲサイクリン
                      ポリミキシン             Co-trimoxazole
                      フォスフォマイシン          リファンピシン
•   各抗生剤の親和性                             クロラムフェニコール


    •   高齢者では親水性の薬剤のVdは減少 → 血中濃度が上昇し易い
        新脂質性の薬剤のVdは増加するが, 蓄積し排泄は低下する.

    •   90歳の羸痩の強い寝たきり高齢者の誤嚥性肺炎,
        例え予測ClCr >50だとしても,
        ABPC/SBT 3g q6hで投与するのはどうなんだろう?


                                             Lancet 2010;375:248-51
•   代謝の変化; 肝臓容積, 肝血流の低下
                                     Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121

    •   高齢者ではCytochrome P450も低下しており,
        肝で代謝される薬剤は少量でも効果を示す様になる.
        (β阻害薬, TCA, Nitrateなど)

•   排泄の変化; 腎機能(30台半ばからGFRは6-12mL/min/10y低下する)

    •   Cockcroft-GaultのCCr計算式; (140-年齢)xWt / 72xCr (女性x0.85)
        体重は理想体重を用いる

    •   日本人 70-74歳の平均身長は男性163.7cm, 女性151.4cm
        ここから理想体重を求めると男性59.6kg, 女性44.6kg

    •   高齢女性ではCre<1でも               Cre      0.2       0.4       0.6       0.8       1.0      1.2
                                    男性      281       141        94        70        56        47
        腎機能は悪いかもしれない
                                    女性      179        90        60        45        36        30
•   他のClCr推定方法
Table 1. Formulas available for estimating creatinine clearance1,14,15,17,18                               Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445
Creatinine
clearance estimate                                Formula                                                           Comments
Cockcroft-Gault formula      Estimated creatinine clearance (mL/min) =                 Widely used; Cockroft-Gault equation is used to make dosage adjustments,
                                [140 j age (y) Â weight (kg)]/(72 Â SCr)                because this is how drug manufacturers establish their dosing
                                                                                        recommendations. This is mandated by the FDA.
                             Multiply by 0.85 if female

                             Use ideal body weight:                                    The process of rounding the SCr concentration up by 1.0 mg/dL is not
                             Men = 50 + (2.3 Â number of inches over 5 ft)               supported by medical evidence.
                             Women = 45.5 + (2.3 Â number of inches over 5 ft)

Abbreviated                  Estimated glomerular filtration rate                       May be most effective in patients with diabetic kidney disease, patients
  MDRD equation                (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186 Â serum creatinine                with chronic kidney disease in middle age (average age 51 y), black
                               (mg/dL) Y 1.154 Â age (y) Y 0.203:                       patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and patients with
                             & Â (0.742 if female)                                      preexisting kidney disease. The MDRD equation is often used to stage
                                                                                        patients’ degree of kidney dysfunction.
                             & Â (1.210 if African American)


Actual 24-h                  Time-consuming and increases work for nursing             Pregnant women, patients with extremes of age and weight, patients with
  creatinine collection                                                                  malnutrition, patients with skeletal muscle diseases, patients with
                                                                                         paraplegia or quadriplegia, patients consuming a vegetarian diet and
                                                                                         with rapidly changing kidney function
Circumstances under which these equations are not effective for estimating renal function: extreme body weight: body mass index G19 or 935 kg/m2, significant
muscle mass abnormality (amputations, loss of muscle mass, muscle disease, or paralysis), acute kidney failure, pregnancy, severe hepatopathy, generalized edema,
or ascites.
FDA, Food and Drug Administration; MDRD = modification of diet in renal disease; SCr = serum creatinine.


commonly used calculation, although many practitioners prefer                      what would provide the most accurate estimation of a patient’s
the MDRD formula, which may prove to be more accurate than                         creatinine clearance.20,21
other formulas even though it has not been used for as long as                          In summary, the altered pharmacokinetics observed in
Cockroft-Gault. In elderly adults, a low serum creatinine is not                   most elderly patients significantly affect the particular phar-
always indicative of normal renal function. Because older adults                   macokinetics of a drug. These changes are summarized in
have lower muscle mass than younger people, low serum cre-                         Table 2. Although drug absorption is probably least affected
•   日本とアメリカの平均体重, 慎重の比較
            年齢             男性                  女性
          65-69歳          62.95kg   164.5cm   53.04kg   152.4cm
          70-74歳          62.27kg   163.7cm   51.34kg   151.4cm
          75-79歳          60.16kg   162.0cm   50.18kg   149.7cm
         平成22年度 体力, 運動能力調査

            年齢             男性                  女性
          60-69歳          90.0kg    175.4cm   77.30kg   161.8cm
          70-79歳           85kg     173.8cm   70.60kg   159.2cm
           ≥80歳           76.3kg    170.7cm   64.5kg    156.0cm
         CDC http://www.cdc.gov


    •   このような母集団で評価されたRCT, trialsで投与量が決定されている
        これが日本人にそのまま当てはまるものか?
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121




•   薬剤作用の減弱, 増強

    •   加齢とも無い, 各組織での受容体数の変化, 感受性の変化があり,
        作用が減弱, 増強することも分かっている.
        β阻害薬や刺激薬の効果は減弱し,
        ワーファリンやオピオイドの効果は増強することが判明している.
•   高齢者の薬物動態のまとめ                                      Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445
                              Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121

                      変化                                            結果
              胃酸分泌低下, pHの上昇
     吸収                                                    薬剤吸収率の低下
                消化管血流の低下
                消化管運動の低下                            消化管内薬物残存, 吸収増加
     分布     Total body water 低下, 体重減少                    親水性薬剤のVd低下
                                                       親脂質性薬剤のVd上昇
            脂肪組織の占める割合の上昇
                                                                 排泄遅延
                  アルブミン低下                                  遊離体薬物の上昇
     代謝   酵素誘導の低下, 肝組織減少, 肝血流低下                               肝代謝の低下
             Oxydase system活性の低下
     排泄        GFRの低下, 腎血流低下                                  腎排泄の低下
高齢者で特に問題となりやすい薬剤
             薬剤                               問題
     SU剤, インスリン                         低血糖リスク
       ワーファリン                             出血リスク                      10歳加齢毎に0.5mg程度必要量が減る*
         ジゴキシン                        食欲低下, 不整脈
     ベンゾジアゼピン                           意識障害, 転倒                         高齢者では排泄遅延
       抗ヒスタミン                           意識障害, 尿閉
          H2阻害薬                    意識障害, 昏迷, 抑うつ
         抗精神病薬                     意識障害, 死亡リスク
          抗うつ薬                     意識障害, 便秘, 低血圧
       抗てんかん薬                    意識障害, 肝障害, 腎障害
            NSAID                    消化管出血, 腎不全
            降圧薬                       失神, 徐脈, 低血圧
            利尿薬                  脱水, 低血圧, 電解質異常
             甘草                        低K血症, 高血圧
JAMA 2010;304:1592-1601, Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445                *Chest 2005;127:2049-56
MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 78:613–626, 2011

 •   反対に, 意識障害, 低血糖, 尿閉, 便秘, 低血圧, 不整脈,
     出血, 腎不全, 脱水, 電解質異常があれば薬剤性を先ず疑うべし.
•   健康食品による副作用
                                   MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 78:613–626, 2011
     健康食品, サプリ             問題                               相互作用
                                                   HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors,
       CoQ10          悪心, 下痢, 食欲低下
                                                       warfarin, 化学療法
      エキナセア       頭痛, めまい, 悪心, 便秘, 肝障害                     CYP3A4誘導
                                                  アスピリン, HIV protease阻害薬
       ニンニク         出血, 低血糖, 消化管症状
                                                  CYP2E1阻害作用, CYP3A4誘導
                                                   抗凝固/抗血小板薬, Trazodone,
       イチョウ       出血, 悪心, 頭痛, 下痢, 動悸, 不安            NSAID, MAOI, 抗精神病薬,
                                                  インスリン, CYP3A4と2C19阻害
                                                   インスリン, SU剤, 抗凝固薬,
    チョウセンニンジン       高血圧, 頻脈, 下痢, 低血糖
                                                  MAOI, イマチニブ, CYP3A4阻害
      グルコサミン         消化管症状, 頭痛, 浮腫                             不明
                                                ベンゾジアゼピン, バルビツレート
    カバカバ(コショウ科)      鎮静, 肝障害, 意識障害
                                             CYP2E1, 1A2, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4阻害
      ノコギリヤシ         頭痛, 悪心, 下痢, 出血                         抗凝固薬
                                                   ジルチアゼム, ニフェジピン,
                     下痢, 頭痛, 悪心, 昏迷,
     西洋オトギリ草                                    ワーファリン, SSRI, TCA, 経口避妊薬,
                       不眠, 日光過敏
                                             テオフィリン, CYP3A4, 2C9, 2C19, 2E1誘導
                                                ベンゾジアゼピン, ハロペリドール
    セイヨウカノコソウ         鎮静, 頭痛, 離脱症状
                                                      CYP450, 2D6, 3A4阻害
Polypharmacy
                                                 Drugs Aging 2003;20:817-832


•   Polypharmacy; 多剤服用 には主に3つのタイプがある.

    •   Appropriate polypharmacy; 患者本人の疾患, 病態に対して
         妥当といえる処方のみだが, 総量が多い場合

    •   Inappropriate polypharmacy; 疾患, 病態に対して
         妥当とは言えない, 過度な処方がされている場合.

    •   Redundant pseudopolypharmacy; 実際使用しているよりも多く,
         患者が報告しているケース.
         患者の誤解, 医師のカルテの記載ミス
         (前のカルテを参照し続けているなど)が原因となる.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121




•   多剤となる理由;

    •   高齢者の多彩な慢性疾患, 訴えに応じて処方されるパターン.

    •   複数の医師に処方され, しばしば同じ作用の薬剤が
        処方されているパターン.

    •   薬剤の副作用を更に薬剤で対応されているパターン

    •   アドヒアランス低下を効果不十分と判断され,
        増量されているパターン.
Drugs Aging 2003;20:817-832



•   多剤の使用の問題点は6つ.

    •   副作用の増加,
        アドヒアランスの低下,
        薬剤間相互作用,
        Medication Errors 
        上記による入院率の増加,
        医療費の増大.

    •   2剤使用すると副作用のリスクは13%, 4剤の使用では38%,
        7剤以上の使用では82%まで上昇する.

    •   多剤では当然アドヒアランスも低下する.
•   イタリアのRetrospective study         Drug Aging 2010;27:1019-1028



    •   ≥65yの887165名のうち, 平均薬剤使用数は6.3±4.2
        1-4剤使用例が39.3%, 5-7剤使用例が28.4%,
        8-10剤使用例が17.4%, 11-14剤が10.2%, 15剤以上が4.7%

    •   高齢者ほどPolypharmacyのリスクは高い
        65-74歳をReferenceとした時,
        75-84歳ではOR 1.76[1.74-1.78]
        ≥85歳ではOR 1.83[1.80-1.85]
薬剤による副作用


•   内科入院の2.4-6.7%が薬剤の副作用によるもの.
    その大半が高齢者.

    •   高齢者の薬剤副作用のリスクは全体の3倍.
        高齢者の再入院の20%は薬剤による副作用が原因との報告もある.
        その75%は薬剤を適切に使用すれば予防可能であった.
投薬のチェック方法


•   Beers’ criteria;  

    •   Beersが1991年に提唱した, 高齢者に害を及ぼす可能性のある
        薬剤のリスト. 2012年にUpdateが発表されており, 以下のURLでDL可能
        (http://www.americangeriatrics.org/health_care_professionals/clinical_practice/
        clinical_guidelines_recommendations/2012)

    •   大量のため, 割愛. ポケットブックもDL可能であり,
        ポケットデバイスに入れておくと便利.
Table 1 (continued from page 1)

AGS BEERS CRITERIA                                                                                                               TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults
                                                                                                                                                Organ System/                                   Recommendation, Rationale,
FOR POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE                                                                                                         Therapeutic Category/Drug(s)               Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)
                                                                                                                                 Antispasmodics                            Avoid except in short-term palliative care to decrease
MEDICATION USE IN OLDER ADULTS                                                                                                   n Belladonna alkaloids                    oral secretions.
                                                                                                                                 n Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide
FROM THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY                                                                                             n Dicyclomine                             Highly anticholinergic, uncertain effectiveness.
                                                                                                                                 n Hyoscyamine
This clinical tool, based on The AGS 2012 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older           n Propantheline                           QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
Adults (AGS 2012 Beers Criteria), has been developed to assist healthcare providers in improving medication safety in            n Scopolamine
older adults. Our purpose is to inform clinical decision-making concerning the prescribing of medications for older
adults in order to improve safety and quality of care.                                                                          Antithrombotics
                                                                                                                                Dipyridamole, oral short-acting* (does not       Avoid.
Originally conceived of in 1991 by the late Mark Beers, MD, a geriatrician, the Beers Criteria catalogues medications           apply to the extended-release combination with   May cause orthostatic hypotension; more effective alternatives
that cause adverse drug events in older adults due to their pharmacologic properties and the physiologic changes of             aspirin)                                         available; IV form acceptable for use in cardiac stress testing.
aging. In 2011, the AGS undertook an update of the criteria, assembling a team of experts and funding the develop-                                                               QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
ment of the AGS 2012 Beers Criteria using an enhanced, evidence-based methodology. Each criterion is rated (qual-               Ticlopidine*                                     Avoid.
ity of evidence and strength of evidence) using the American College of Physicians’ Guideline Grading System, which                                                              Safer, effective alternatives available.
is based on the GRADE scheme developed by Guyatt et al.                                                                                                                          QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
The full document together with accompanying resources can be viewed online at www.americangeriatrics.org.                      Anti-infective
                                                                                                                                Nitrofurantoin                                   Avoid for long-term suppression; avoid in patients with
INTENDED USE                                                                                                                                                                     CrCl <60 mL/min.
The goal of this clinical tool is to improve care of older adults by reducing their exposure to Potentially Inappropri-                                                          Potential for pulmonary toxicity; safer alternatives available; lack of
ate Medications (PIMs).
   n This should be viewed as a guide for identifying medications for which the risks of use in older adults outweigh                                                            concentration in the urine.
                                                                                                                                                                                 QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
   n  These criteria are not meant to be applied in a punitive manner.
   n  This list is not meant to supersede clinical judgment or an individual patient’s values and needs. Prescribing and        Cardiovascular
   managing disease conditions should be individualized and involve shared decision-making.                                     Alpha1 blockers                                  Avoid use as an antihypertensive.
   n These criteria also underscore the importance of using a team approach to prescribing and the use of non-                  n Doxazosin                                      High risk of orthostatic hypotension; not recommended as routine
                                                                                                                                n Prazosin                                       treatment for hypertension; alternative agents have superior risk/
   pharmacological approaches and of having economic and organizational incentives for this type of model.
   n Implicit criteria such as the STOPP/START criteria and Medication Appropriateness Index should be used in                  n Terazosin
   a complementary manner with the 2012 AGS Beers Criteria to guide clinicians in making decisions about safe                                                                    QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
   medication use in older adults.                                                                                              Alpha agonists                                                                                                        -
                                                                                                                                n Clonidine                                      ers as listed.
The criteria are not applicable in all circumstances (eg, patient’s receiving palliative and hospice care). If a clinician is   n Guanabenz*                                     High risk of adverse CNS effects; may cause bradycardia and
                                                                                                                                n Guanfacine*                                    orthostatic hypotension; not recommended as routine treatment
of the medication as potentially inappropriate can serve as a reminder for close monitoring so that the potential for           n Methyldopa*                                    for hypertension.
an adverse drug effect can be incorporated into the medical record and prevented or detected early.                             n Reserpine (>0.1 mg/day)*                       QE = Low; SR = Strong
                                                                                                                                Antiarrhythmic drugs (Class Ia, Ic, III)
                                                                                                                                n Amiodarone
TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults                                   n Dofetilide
                                                                                                                                n Dronedarone
                Organ System/                                   Recommendation, Rationale,
                                                                                                                                n Flecainide                                     harms than rhythm control for most older adults.
      Therapeutic Category/Drug(s)               Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)
                                                                                                                                n Ibutilide
Anticholinergics (excludes TCAs)                                                                                                n Procainamide                                   Amiodarone is associated with multiple toxicities, including thyroid
First-generation antihistamines (as single Avoid.                                                                               n Propafenone                                    disease, pulmonary disorders, and QT interval prolongation.
agent or as part of combination products)                                                                                       n Quinidine                                      QE = High; SR = Strong
n Brompheniramine                          Highly anticholinergic; clearance reduced with advanced age, and                     n Sotalol
n Carbinoxamine                            tolerance develops when used as hypnotic; increased risk of confu-                   Disopyramide*                                    Avoid.
n Chlorpheniramine                         sion, dry mouth, constipation, and other anticholinergic effects/                                                                     Disopyramide is a potent negative inotrope and therefore may
n Clemastine                               toxicity.                                                                                                                             induce heart failure in older adults; strongly anticholinergic; other
n Cyproheptadine                                                                                                                                                                 antiarrhythmic drugs preferred.
n Dexbrompheniramine                       Use of diphenhydramine in special situations such as acute treat-                                                                     QE = Low; SR = Strong
n Dexchlorpheniramine                      ment of severe allergic reaction may be appropriate.
n Diphenhydramine (oral)
                                                                                                                                Dronedarone
n Doxylamine
                                                                                                                                                                                 heart failure.
                                           QE = High (Hydroxyzine and Promethazine), Moderate (All others); SR
n Hydroxyzine                              = Strong
n Promethazine
                                                                                                                                                                                 Worse outcomes have been reported in patients taking drone-
n Triprolidine
                                                                                                                                                                                 general, rate control is preferred over rhythm control for atrial
Antiparkinson agents                               Avoid.
n Benztropine (oral)                                                                                                                                                             QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
n Trihexyphenidyl                                  Not recommended for prevention of extrapyramidal symptoms                    Digoxin >0.125 mg/day                            Avoid.
                                                   with antipsychotics; more effective agents available for treatment of                                                         In heart failure, higher dosages associated with no additional
                                                   Parkinson disease.
                                                                                                                                                                                 may increase risk of toxicity.
                                                   QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                                                                    QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
Table 1 (continued from page 2)                                                                                                           Table 1 (continued from page 3)
 TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults                                             TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults
                Organ System/                                   Recommendation, Rationale,                                                                Organ System/                                   Recommendation, Rationale,
      Therapeutic Category/Drug(s)               Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)                                     Therapeutic Category/Drug(s)               Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)
 Nifedipine, immediate release*            Avoid.                                                                                          Nonbenzodiazepine                         Avoid chronic use (>90 days)
                                                                                                                                           hypnotics                                 Benzodiazepine-receptor agonists that have adverse events similar
                                                            Potential for hypotension; risk of precipitating myocardial ischemia.          n Eszopiclone                             to those of benzodiazepines in older adults (e.g., delirium, falls,
                                                            QE = High; SR = Strong                                                         n Zolpidem                                fractures); minimal improvement in sleep latency and duration.
                                                                                                                                           n Zaleplon                                QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
Spironolactone >25 mg/day                                   Avoid in patients with heart failure or with a CrCl <30
                                                            mL/min.                                                                        Ergot mesylates*                          Avoid.
                                                                                                                                           Isoxsuprine*
                                                            In heart failure, the risk of hyperkalemia is higher in older adults if                                                  QE = High; SR = Strong
                                                            taking >25 mg/day.
                                                            QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                     Endocrine
                                                                                                                                           Androgens                                 Avoid unless indicated for moderate to severe
Central Nervous System                                                                                                                     n Methyltestosterone*                     hypogonadism.
Tertiary TCAs, alone or in combination:                     Avoid.                                                                         n Testosterone                            Potential for cardiac problems and contraindicated in men with
n Amitriptyline                                                                                                                                                                      prostate cancer.
n Chlordiazepoxide-                                         Highly anticholinergic, sedating, and cause orthostatic hypotension;                                                     QE = Moderate; SR = Weak
  amitriptyline                                                                                                                            Desiccated thyroid                        Avoid.
n Clomipramine                                              to that of placebo.                                                                                                      Concerns about cardiac effects; safer alternatives available.
n
                                                                                                                                                                                     QE = Low; SR = Strong
n   Imipramine                                              QE = High; SR = Strong
n   Perphenazine-amitriptyline                                                                                                             Estrogens with or without progestins      Avoid oral and topical patch.Topical vaginal cream: Ac-
n   Trimipramine
                                                                                                                                                                                       management of dyspareunia, lower urinary tract infec-
                                                        -                                                                                                                              tions, and other vaginal symptoms.
ond- (atypical) generation (see online for full list)       non-pharmacologic options have failed and patient is                                                                       Evidence of carcinogenic potential (breast and endometrium); lack
                                                            threat to self or others.                                                                                                  of cardioprotective effect and cognitive protection in older women.
                                                                                                                                                                                       Evidence that vaginal estrogens for treatment of vaginal dryness is
                                                            Increased risk of cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and mortality in                                                       safe and effective in women with breast cancer, especially at dos-
                                                            persons with dementia.
                                                            QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                                                                 QE = High (Oral and Patch), Moderate (Topical); SR = Strong (Oral and
Thioridazine                                                Avoid.                                                                                                                     Patch),Weak (Topical)
Mesoridazine                                                                                                                              Growth hormone                               Avoid, except as hormone replacement following pituitary
                                                            Highly anticholinergic and greater risk of QT-interval prolongation.                                                       gland removal.
                                                            QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                                                                 Effect on body composition is small and associated with edema,
                                                                                                                                                                                       arthralgia, carpal tunnel syndrome, gynecomastia, impaired fasting
Barbiturates                                                Avoid.                                                                                                                     glucose.
n Amobarbital*
n Butabarbital*
                                                                                                                                                                                       QE = High; SR = Strong
n Butalbital                                                greater risk of overdose at low dosages.                                      Insulin, sliding scale                       Avoid.
n Mephobarbital*                                                                                                                                                                       Higher risk of hypoglycemia without improvement in hyperglyce-
n Pentobarbital*                                            QE = High; SR = Strong                                                                                                     mia management regardless of care setting.
n Phenobarbital                                                                                                                                                                        QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
n Secobarbital*
                                                                                                                                          Megestrol                                    Avoid.
Benzodiazepines                                                                                                                       -                                                Minimal effect on weight; increases risk of thrombotic events and
Short- and intermediate-acting:                             nia, agitation, or delirium.                                                                                               possibly death in older adults.
  n Alprazolam                                                                                                                                                                         QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
  n Estazolam                                               Older adults have increased sensitivity to benzodiazepines and                Sulfonylureas, long-duration                 Avoid.
    n                                                       decreased metabolism of long-acting agents. In general, all ben-              n Chlorpropamide                             Chlorpropamide: prolonged half-life in older adults; can cause
    nOxazepam                                               zodiazepines increase risk of cognitive impairment, delirium, falls,          n Glyburide                                  prolonged hypoglycemia; causes SIADH
    nTemazepam                                              fractures, and motor vehicle accidents in older adults.                                                                    Glyburide: higher risk of severe prolonged hypoglycemia in older
    nTriazolam                                                                                                                                                                         adults.
Long-acting:                                                May be appropriate for seizure disorders, rapid eye movement                                                               QE = High; SR = Strong
  n Chlorazepate                                            sleep disorders, benzodiazepine withdrawal, ethanol withdrawal,
  n Chlordiazepoxide                                        severe generalized anxiety disorder, periprocedural anesthesia,               Gastrointestinal
  n Chlordiazepoxide-amitriptyline                          end-of-life care.                                                             Metoclopramide                               Avoid, unless for gastroparesis.
  n Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide                                                                                                                                                         Can cause extrapyramidal effects including tardive dyskinesia; risk
  n Clonazepam                                              QE = High; SR = Strong                                                                                                     may be further increased in frail older adults.
  n Diazepam                                                                                                                                                                           QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
  n Flurazepam
  n Quazepam                                                                                                                              Mineral oil, given orally                    Avoid.
                                                                                                                                                                                       Potential for aspiration and adverse effects; safer alternatives avail-
Chloral hydrate*                                            Avoid.                                                                                                                     able.
                                                                                                                                                                                       QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
                                                            light of overdose with doses only 3 times the recommended dose.               Trimethobenzamide                            Avoid.
                                                            QE = Low; SR = Strong                                                                                                      One of the least effective antiemetic drugs; can cause extrapyrami-
Meprobamate                                                 Avoid.                                                                                                                     dal adverse effects.
                                                            High rate of physical dependence; very sedating.                                                                           QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
                                                            QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
Table 1 (continued from page 4)                                                                                          Table 2 (continued from page 5)
 TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults                            TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug-
                Organ System/                                   Recommendation, Rationale,                                Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome
      Therapeutic Category/Drug(s)               Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)                Disease or                      Drug(s)                      Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence
                                                                                                                           Syndrome                                                           (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)
 Pain Medications
                                                                                                                          Syncope        Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs)    Avoid.
 Meperidine                                Avoid.                                                                                        Peripheral alpha blockers
                                           Not an effective oral analgesic in dosages commonly used; may                                 n Doxazosin                                 Increases risk of orthostatic hypotension or brady-
                                           cause neurotoxicity; safer alternatives available.                                            n Prazosin                                  cardia.
                                           QE = High; SR = Strong                                                                        n Terazosin
                                                                                                                                                                                     QE = High (Alpha blockers), Moderate (AChEIs,TCAs and
Non-COX-selective NSAIDs, oral                 Avoid chronic use unless other alternatives are not effec-                                Tertiary TCAs                               antipsychotics); SR = Strong (AChEIs and TCAs),Weak
n Aspirin >325 mg/day                          tive and patient can take gastroprotective agent (proton-                                                                             (Alpha blockers and antipsychotics)
n Diclofenac                                                                                                                             Chlorpromazine, thioridazine, and olan-
n                                                                                                                                        zapine
n   Etodolac                                   Increases risk of GI bleeding/peptic ulcer disease in high-risk            Central Nervous System
n   Fenoprofen
n   Ibuprofen                                  corticosteroids, anticoagulants, or antiplatelet agents. Use of pro-       Chronic        Bupropion                                   Avoid.
n   Ketoprofen                                 ton pump inhibitor or misoprostol reduces but does not eliminate           seizures or Chlorpromazine
n   Meclofenamate                              risk. Upper GI ulcers, gross bleeding, or perforation caused by            epilepsy       Clozapine
n   Mefenamic acid                                                                                                                       Maprotiline                                 patients with well-controlled seizures in whom alter-
n   Meloxicam                                  months, and in about 2%–4% of patients treated for 1 year. These                          Olanzapine                                  native agents have not been effective.
n   Nabumetone                                 trends continue with longer duration of use.                                              Thioridazine
n   Naproxen                                                                                                                             Thiothixene                                 QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
n   Oxaprozin                                  QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                                Tramadol
n   Piroxicam                                                                                                             Delirium       All TCAs                                    Avoid.
n   Sulindac                                                                                                                             Anticholinergics (see online for full list)
n   Tolmetin                                                                                                                             Benzodiazepines                             Avoid in older adults with or at high risk of delirium
                                                                                                                                         Chlorpromazine                              because of inducing or worsening delirium in older
Indomethacin                                   Avoid.                                                                                    Corticosteroids                             adults; if discontinuing drugs used chronically, taper to
Ketorolac, includes parenteral                 Increases risk of GI bleeding/peptic ulcer disease in high-risk                           H2-receptor antagonist                      avoid withdrawal symptoms.
                                               groups (See Non-COX selective NSAIDs)                                                     Meperidine
                                               Of all the NSAIDs, indomethacin has most adverse effects.                                 Sedative hypnotics                          QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
                                               QE = Moderate (Indomethacin), High (Ketorolac); SR = Strong                               Thioridazine
Pentazocine*                                   Avoid.                                                                     Dementia       Anticholinergics (see online for full list) Avoid.
                                               Opioid analgesic that causes CNS adverse effects, including confu-         & cognitive Benzodiazepines                                Avoid due to adverse CNS effects.
                                               sion and hallucinations, more commonly than other narcotic drugs;          impairment H2-receptor antagonists                         Avoid antipsychotics for behavioral problems of
                                               is also a mixed agonist and antagonist; safer alternatives available.                     Zolpidem                                    dementia unless non-pharmacologic options have
                                               QE = Low; SR = Strong                                                                     Antipsychotics, chronic and as-needed use failed and patient is a threat to themselves or others.
Skeletal muscle relaxants                      Avoid.                                                                                                                                Antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk
n Carisoprodol                                 Most muscle relaxants poorly tolerated by older adults, because of                                                                    of cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and mortality in
n Chlorzoxazone                                anticholinergic adverse effects, sedation, increased risk of fractures;                                                               persons with dementia.
n Cyclobenzaprine                              effectiveness at dosages tolerated by older adults is questionable.                                                                   QE = High; SR = Strong
n Metaxalone                                   QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                History        Anticonvulsants                                 Avoid unless safer alternatives are not avail-
n Methocarbamol
                                                                                                                         of falls or    Antipsychotics
n Orphenadrine
                                                                                                                         fractures      Benzodiazepines
*Infrequently used drugs. Table 1 Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin                       Nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics                     Ability to produce ataxia, impaired psychomotor
                                                                                                                                        n Eszopiclone                                   function, syncope, and additional falls; shorter-acting
receptor blockers; CNS, central nervous system; COX, cyclooxygenase; CrCl, creatinine clearance; GI, gastroin-
                                                                                                                                        n Zaleplon                                      benzodiazepines are not safer than long-acting ones.
                                                                                                                                        n Zolpidem
secretion; SR, Strength of Recommendation; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; QE, Quality of Evidence
                                                                                                                                                                                        QE = High; SR = Strong
                                                                                                                                        TCAs/SSRIs
TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug-
Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome                                        Insomnia       Oral decongestants                              Avoid.
                                                                                                                                        n Pseudoephedrine
Disease or                   Drug(s)                     Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence                                 n Phenylephrine Stimulants                      CNS stimulant effects.
Syndrome                                                       (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)                                   n Amphetamine
Cardiovascular                                                                                                                          n Methylphenidate                               QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
Heart failure NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors              Avoid.                                                                           n Pemoline Theobromines
                                                                                                                                        n Theophylline
               Nondihydropyridine CCBs (avoid only for                                                           -                      n Caffeine
               systolic heart failure)                     bate heart failure.                                           Parkinson’s    All antipsychotics (see online publica-         Avoid.
               n Diltiazem                                                                                               disease        tion for full list, except for quetiapine and   Dopamine receptor antagonists with potential to
               n Verapamil                                 QE = Moderate (NSAIDs, CCBs, Dronedarone), High (Thia-                       clozapine)                                      worsen parkinsonian symptoms.
                                                           zolidinediones (glitazones)), Low (Cilostazol); SR = Strong
               Pioglitazone, rosiglitazone                                                                                              Antiemetics                                     Quetiapine and clozapine appear to be less likely to
                                                                                                                                        n Metoclopramide                                precipitate worsening of Parkinson disease.
               Cilostazol                                                                                                               n Prochlorperazine
               Dronedarone                                                                                                              n Promethazine                                  QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
Table 2 (continued from page 6)                                                                                      Table 2 (continued from page 7)
 TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug-           TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug-
 Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome                                    Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome
 Disease or                      Drug(s)                      Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence           Disease or                      Drug(s)                   Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence
  Syndrome                                                          (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)             Syndrome                                                       (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR)
 Gastrointestinal                                                                                                                    Inhaled anticholinergic agents           Avoid in men.
 Chronic         Oral antimuscarinics for urinary inconti- Avoid unless no other alternatives.                        urinary tract
 constipation nence                                                                                                   symptoms, Strongly anticholinergic drugs, except                                                           -
                 n Darifenacin                             Can worsen constipation; agents for urinary incon-         benign         antimuscarinics for urinary incontinence tion.
                 n Fesoterodine                            tinence: antimuscarinics overall differ in incidence of    prostatic      (see Table 9 for complete list).
                 n Oxybutynin (oral)                       constipation; response variable; consider alternative      hyperplasia                                             QE = Moderate; SR = Strong (Inhaled agents),Weak (All
                 n Solifenacin                             agent if constipation develops.                                                                                    others)
                 n Tolterodine                                                                                       Stress or     Alpha-blockers                                Avoid in women.
                 n Trospium                                QE = High (For Urinary Incontinence), Moderate/Low (All   mixed         n Doxazosin
                                                           Others); SR = Strong                                      urinary in-   n Prazosin                                    Aggravation of incontinence.
                 Nondihydropyridine CCB                                                                              continence    n Terazosin
                 n Diltiazem                                                                                                                                                     QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
                 n Verapamil
                                                                                                                     Table 2 Abbreviations: CCBs, calcium channel blockers; AChEIs, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; CNS, central ner-
               First-generation antihistamines as single                                                                                                                                                                                 -
               agent or part of combination products                                                                 tion; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; QE, Quality of Evidence
               n Brompheniramine (various)
               n Carbinoxamine
               n Chlorpheniramine
                                                                                                                     TABLE 3: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medications to Be Used with Caution in
               n Clemastine (various)
                                                                                                                     Older Adults
               n Cyproheptadine                                                                                                 Drug(s)          Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommenda-
               n Dexbrompheniramine                                                                                                                                                 tion (SR)
               n Dexchlorpheniramine (various)                                                                       Aspirin for primary preven-
               n Diphenhydramine                                                                                     tion of cardiac events
               n Doxylamine
               n Hydroxyzine                                                                                                                        QE = Low; SR = Weak
               n Promethazine
               n Triprolidine                                                                                        Dabigatran

               Anticholinergics/antispasmodics (see online
               for full list of drugs with strong anticholinergic
               properties)                                                                                                                          QE = Moderate; SR = Weak
               n Antipsychotics                                                                                      Prasugrel
               n Belladonna alkaloids
               n Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide
               n Dicyclomine                                                                                                                        risk older patients (eg, those with prior myocardial infarction or diabetes).
               n Hyoscyamine                                                                                                                        QE = Moderate; SR = Weak
               n Propantheline
               n Scopolamine
                                                                                                                     Antipsychotics                 Use with caution.
               n Tertiary TCAs (amitriptyline, clomip-
                                                                                                                     Carbamazepine
                                                                                                                     Carboplatin                    May exacerbate or cause SIADH or hyponatremia; need to monitor sodium level
               ramine, doxepin, imipramine, and trimip-                                                              Cisplatin                      closely when starting or changing dosages in older adults due to increased risk.
               ramine)                                                                                               Mirtazapine
History of     Aspirin (>325 mg/day)                              Avoid unless other alternatives are not ef-        SNRIs                          QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
gastric or     Non–COX-2 selective NSAIDs                         fective and patient can take gastroprotective      SSRIs
duodenal                                                                                                             TCAs
ulcers                                                                                                               Vincristine
                                                           May exacerbate existing ulcers or cause new/addi-         Vasodilators                   Use with caution.
                                                           tional ulcers.
                                                           QE = Moderate; SR = Strong                                                               May exacerbate episodes of syncope in individuals with history of syncope.
Kidney/Urinary Tract                                                                                                                                QE = Moderate; SR = Weak
Chronic kid- NSAIDs                                        Avoid.                                                    Table 3 Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone
ney disease                                                                                                          secretion; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SNRIs, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors;
stages IV                                                  May increase risk of kidney injury.                       SR, Strength of Recommendation; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; QE, Quality of Evidence
and V
               Triamterene (alone or in combination)       May increase risk of acute kidney injury.
                                                                                                                       The American Geriatrics Society gratefully acknowledges the support of the John A. Hartford Foundation,
                                                           QE = Moderate (NSAIDs), Low (Triamterene); SR = Strong                    Retirement Research Foundation and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
                                                           (NSAIDs),Weak (Triamterene)



                                                                                                                     AGS
Urinary        Estrogen oral and transdermal (excludes     Avoid in women.
incontinence intravaginal estrogen)                                                                                                        THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
(all types) in                                             Aggravation of incontinence.                                                    Geriatrics Health Professionals.
women
                                                           QE = High; SR = Strong                                                                                                                            www.americangeriatrics.org
アドヒアランスのチェック
              MANAGING MEDICATIONS IN CLINICALLY COMPLEX ELDERS
•   アドヒアランスを障害する因子                                      JAMA. 2010;304(14):1592-1601
                                                                                               g
              Table 1. Barriers to Medication Adherence and Targeted Solutions
                                                                                               i
                       Barriers                         Potential Solutions
                                                                                               a
              Forgetting to take;       Use pill organizers, medication calendars, blister
                 limited organizational    packs, electronic dispensing devices; simplify      c
                 skills                    regimen and reduce pill burden; encourage           i
                                           active family/caregiver involvement; use
                                           Internet-linked or electronic adherence aids        e
                                           and reporting systems                               m
              Patient believes drug is    Work collaboratively with patient to address         c
                  not needed, is             concerns and establish shared goals of care;
                  ineffective, or that       provide educational (including literacy-
                                                                                               p
                  too many drugs             appropriate) materials using teach-back           c
                  are being taken            approach; assess drug effectiveness; simplify     m
                                             regimen and reduce pill burden
              Difficulty taking           Substitute with easier-to-use medications (eg,
                                                                                               p
                   (eg, opening pill         liquid if trouble swallowing; ordering easy-off   g
                   bottles, swallowing)      caps); simplify regimen and reduce pill           i
                                             burden; use pill cutters, oral dosing syringes,
                                             insulin syringe magnification, spacer for         i
                                             inhalers
              Cost                        Substitute with lower-cost medications (eg,          G
                                             generic vs brand name) and reduce
                                             unnecessary ones; assess prescription drug        M
                                             insurance and direct patient to apply for         t
                                             low-income subsidy and prescription drug
                                             assistance programs
                                                                                               h
どの薬剤を切るべきか?
creased compared with the control group. The present study
tests the feasibility of applying the same algorithm in com-                     Discuss the following with the patient/guardian
     • 各患者背景,
munity-dwelling elderly patients.                                            An evidence-based consensus exists for using the
                                                                      Yes    drug for the indication given in its current dosing rate
        リスク-ベネフィットを考慮し,
             METHODS
                                                                             in this patient’s age group and disability level, and the
                                                                             benefit outweighs all possible known adverse effects

                                                                                                            No/Not sure
        中止,STUDY PARTICIPANTS
            変更を決める.                                                                                                                      No
                                                                             Indication seems valid and relevant in this patient’s age         S
                                                                             group and disability level                                        T
This prospective cohort study included consecutive elderly pa-                                                                                 O
tients referred by their family physician or family for compre-                                             Yes                                P
                                                                                                                                               D
hensive geriatric assessments from February 2005 through June                                                                            Yes   R
2008 and excluded patients with advanced disease (cancer or                  Do the known possible adverse reactions of the drug               U
                                                                             outweigh possible benefit in old, disabled patients?              G
noncancer) in whom the initial estimate of life expectancy was
less than 3 months and patients in whom follow-up availabil-                                                No
      • 入院というイベントは
ity was shorter than 4 months. Participants were assessed and                                                                            Yes
recommendations were made on medications based on the Good                   Any adverse symptoms or signs that may be related to              S
                                                                             the drug?                                                         H
        薬剤調節の最も良い機会と
Palliative–Geriatric Practice (GP-GP) algorithm (Figure).12 As-
sessments were performed either at the day care center for se-                                              No
                                                                                                                                               I
                                                                                                                                               F
                                                                                                                                               T
nior citizens in Pardes Hana or at the patient’s home in Israel.                                                                               T
        捉えるべし.
The rationale for recommendations was then explained and dis-                Is there another drug that may be superior to the one
                                                                             in question?
                                                                                                                                         Yes
                                                                                                                                               O
cussed in detail with each patient and/or guardian/family. They                                                                                A
                                                                                                                                               N
were informed of the pros and cons of each medication pre-                                                  No                                 O
scribed, the level of evidence for a positive benefit to risk ratio                                                                            T
                                                                             Can the dosing rate be reduced with no significant risk?          H
and its possible impact on longevity and quality of life. Fol-                                                                                 E
lowing this discussion and based on patient and/or guardian/                                                                                   R

family preferences and consent, detailed letters were sent to the                 No                                             Yes           D
                                                                                                                                               R
family physicians with recommendations to stop as many “non–                                                                                   U
                                                                      Continue with the same dosing rate                Reduce dose            G
life saving drugs” as possible for at least 3 months. When stop-
ping a Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648-1654 appropriate, dose
   Arch drug therapy was not considered
•   その患者背景, 状態に一致した
          母集団での明確なEvidenceあり → 薬剤は継続. (実際殆ど無し)

      •   患者背景, 状態を考慮し, 妥当ではないと判断 → 中止.

      •   副作用が利点を上回る → 中止.

      •   副作用が認められるが, 利点が大きい場合 → 薬剤を変更

      •   他の薬剤でもっと効果が高いものがる場合 → 変更

      •   投薬を減量しても不利益が無いと考えられる場合 → 減量


Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648-1654
患者に応じた薬剤の調節
  •   ① 患者背景, 状態, 年齢, 余命を考慮し,
       それぞれのプロブレム毎のゴールを決める(アウトカム設定)

  •   ② 各プロブレムに対して投与されている薬剤が
       そのアウトカムに沿っているか?
        → 沿っていないならば変更, 中止すべき.
        → プロブレムと投与薬剤が合っていない場合も中止

  •   ③ 薬剤の副作用のアセスメントし,
       副作用と薬剤投与の利益を比較.
        → 副作用の方が大きいならば中止 or 減量 or 変更
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648-1654を一部改変
palliative m
                                                                                                                               medications
                     Less Time                                                                                    Palliative   those addre
                                                                                                                               toms. Exam
                                                                                                                               targets includ
                                                                                                                               vention of m




                                                                                             Trea
                                                                                                                               maintenance




                                                                   efit




                                                                                                 tmen
                                                        y




                                                                 l Ben
                                                                                                                               tion, and tre




                                                   tanc




                                                                                    Goal




                                                                                                     t Tar
                                              xpec




                                                             Unti




                                                                                     s of



                                                                                                          get
                                                                                                                                       CA




                                                E




                                                            Time




                                                                                      Care
                                           Life
                                                                                                                                      WITH



                                               g
                                          ainin
                                      Rem
                                                                                                                     These conce
                                                                                                                     nents in a
                                                               Appropriate                                           prescribing l
                                                               Medications
                                                                                                                     expectancy
               More Time                                                                                    Curative
                                                                                                                     goals of care
                                                                                                                     (Figure 3)
                                                                                                                     components
          Figure 3. The model shows that the 4 steps in medication decision making form a pyramid, visually
          representing the appropriate medications at any level. At the top are represented patients for whom        others, yield
•   どの薬剤が必要になるかはそれぞれの患者で異なる.
          remaining life expectancy is limited, drugs should have the shortest time until benefit, goals of care are
          palliative, and treatment targets are focused on symptom management. Moving toward the bottom, the
                                                                                                                     propriate m
                                                                                                                     able limitatio
          base of appropriate medications expands as the patient’s life expectancy is longer, time until benefit may
          be longer, goals of care are more aggressive, and treatment targets are aimed more at preventive
                                                                                                                     be made to d
          strategies. The bottom of the pyramid therefore contains all medications that are otherwise appropriate    cations ident
    • 余命, 治療のゴール, 目的, 薬剤開始∼効果発現までの時間の4軸で
          according to existing criteria for patients 65 years and older.                                            components

        考える方法もある.
                                     (REPRINTED) ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 166, MAR 27, 2006                         WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM
                                                                                 606

                                                                   ©2006 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
    •   例えば余命が2年なのに効果発現まで2年以上かかる治療は無意味
Downloaded From: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/ by JUNKO NAGASUE on 11/29/2012 Intern Med 2006;166:605-609
                                                                              Arch
•   Case 1; 75歳女性, HT, 変形性関節症, 2型DM.

    •   ADLは自立しており, 余命は17年程度と予測(life tableより)
         → 各問題点においてしっかりとマネージメントし,
          Strokeや虚血性心疾患の予防, 変形性関節症の予防,
          転倒リスクの回避, 骨粗鬆症のチェック, 治療などキッチリ必要

    •   DMに関しては低血糖リスクが低い薬剤の選択.




                                       Arch Intern Med 2006;166:605-609
•   Case 2; 72歳男性, 重度心不全, COPDでHOT導入.

    •   予測余命は数ヶ月∼1年程度.
        この状態でいろいろ精査し, それぞれの病態に対応しても
        効果発現までの期間も長く, 意味は乏しい.

    •   むしろ緩和ケア, 対症療法を中心とすべきと言える.
        呼吸苦や不安を緩和する為の薬剤, 気管支拡張薬など.




                                   Arch Intern Med 2006;166:605-609
例題
•   80歳男性, 脳 塞後, 認知症(血管性疑い)で寝たきり.
    食事摂取は可能だがムセが多い.
    2型糖尿病, 高血圧, 高脂血症の既往あり, かかりつけは他院.

    •   そんな患者が誤嚥性肺炎にて入院.

    •   入院時の内服薬は,
        バルプロ酸, セロクエル, SU剤, CCB, スタチン, PPI, アスピリン,
        サアミオン

    •   薬剤調節をどう行う?
•   (使用薬剤に対する)プロブレムを挙げよう

    •   #糖尿病, #高血圧, #高脂血症
        #脳血管性認知症, #脳     塞後

•   それぞれのプロブレムに対応する薬剤は?
                  プロブレム       使用薬剤        コメント
                   糖尿病         SU剤
                   高血圧         CCB
                  高脂血症        スタチン
                              アスピリン
                 脳血管性認知症               ASAの潰瘍予防にPPI
                              サアミオン
                  脳   塞後      アスピリン      上記と同じ
                              バルプロ酸
                   その他                対応するプロブレムが無い?
                              セロクエル
•   ① それぞれのアウトカムは?

    •   前提として, この患者さんの状況は,
        80歳寝たきりで, 余命も数年あるかどうか.
        コミュニケーションは困難で, かろうじて食事可能.
    プロブレム           アウトカム(建前)          状況に合わせたアウトカム(本音)
                 キッチリとHbA1cを押さえる            高齢, 余命も数年
        糖尿病
                     (HbA1c 7%前後)     低血糖だけは起こさない様にしたい...
                  キッチリとBP <130/90へ
        高血圧                           あまり頑張りすぎて低血圧になっても...
                    降圧薬は(Level 1A)
                 LDL-chol<80にしたいところ
        高脂血症                           スタチンは14%再発を減らす, けど...
                   スタチンは(Level 1B)
脳血管性認知症               脳   塞予防
                                             アスピリンは
                    抗血小板薬は必須             1000人に7名で再発を減らす
        脳   塞後
                       (Level IA)        死亡率は1000人に4名減らす
                                           出血は1000人に2名
                                                   Lancet Neurol 2011;10: 357–71
•   ② アウトカムと薬剤の関係
プロブレム 状況に合わせたアウトカム(本音)      使用薬剤        アセスメント
             高齢, 余命も数年
                                     SU剤は低血糖の高リスク,
 糖尿病     低血糖だけは起こさない様にした     SU剤
                                     高齢者での使用はどうか?
                い...
          あまり頑張りすぎて低血圧に             CCB程度ならば問題無いかも.
 高血圧                         CCB
              なっても...               日頃の血圧をモニタリングし判断
                                       効果的ではあるが,
          スタチンは14%再発を減らす,
高脂血症                        スタチン    この患者に必須かと言われると微
               けど...
                                             妙
脳血管性                                一応, 誤嚥を減らすとの弱いエビ
                            サアミオン
 認知症                                    デンスはある*
             アスピリンは
          1000人に7名で再発を減らす           この数字と余命と出血リスクを
脳   塞後                      アスピリン
          死亡率は1000人に4名減らす               どう考えるか?
            出血は1000人に2名
                            バルプロ酸    これについては情報が無く
 その他
                            セロクエル    さらに聴取する必要がある
                                         *Medicine 2011;90: 279-283
•   ここまでのアセスメントでの薬剤調節;

    •   糖尿病に対してはSU剤から低血糖リスクの少ない他のピオグリタゾ
        ンやメトフォルミンへ変更を試してみる方針とした.

    •   高血圧に対するCCBは継続.
        高脂血症に対するスタチンは中止.

    •   脳   塞に対するアスピリンは迷ったあげく残し,
        サアミオン(Nicegoline)は誤嚥リスクが高いので,
        藁へもすがる思いで残した.

    •   問題は投与理由が不明なバルプロ酸とセロクエル
•   薬剤の病歴を詳しく聴取(From 家族, 前医)

    •   認知症が特に増悪したのは2-3年前.
        その際 不穏, 昼夜逆転, 叫び声, 興奮が強く, 家族がかなり困った.
        主治医に相談し, 眠剤や抗精神病薬が試され,
        その際バルプロ酸, セロクエルが開始.
        痙攣はした事はありません

    •   それら開始後から徐々に不穏や昼夜逆転は消失し,
        活気も低下してきた気がする.

    •   誤嚥やムセがひどくなったのは1-2年前から,
        あ, そう言えばその薬が始まって落ち着いた時期だったかしら?
•   入院後, バルプロ酸, セロクエルは一旦中止し, 経過観察.

    •   誤嚥性肺炎治療と同時にSTリハビリも開始.

    •   入院後からは幾分活気が戻り, 問いかけ対する反応も良好に.
        STリハビリにて刻み食も良好に摂取できる様になり,
        家人から見ても明らかに反応が良くなったと.

    •   ムセも無く, 食事摂取良好となったが,
        身体機能は廃用症候群にてあまり改善なく, 退院となった.

•   今回の薬剤調節;

    •   スタチン, バルプロ酸, セロクエル中止.
        (サアミオンも止められたかも...)
•   Clinical pearl

    •   抗てんかん薬が入っている場合, 必ず, しつこく, 何時, どこで, どのタ
        イミングにてんかん発作があったのかは確認すべきである.
         しばしばてんかんが無いのに他の理由で薬剤が入り, 中止できず
        に意識障害の原因となっていることがある.

    •   抗精神病薬も同様, 何故入っているのかは常に意識しなさい.



                                 Katsushige Takagishi
反対に急に中止するとダメな薬剤は?

              薬剤                             理由                        対応
       抗パーキンソン薬*                     悪性症候群のリスク                    徐々に漸減させる
           ステロイド                      副腎不全のリスク                    徐々に漸減させる
    ベンゾジアゼピン(大量の)                        離脱のリスク                   徐々に漸減させる
     心不全に対するβ阻害薬                     心不全増悪のリスク              中止必要な場合は循環器併診
虚血性心疾患に対する抗血小板薬§                    虚血性心疾患のリスク              中止必要な場合は循環器併診




* Levodopa, Dopamine agonist, COMT阻害薬(Catechol-O-Methyl transferase)
§ DES留置後12mo以内の2剤療法 → 1剤への変更と,
 全期間における1剤療法 → 中止とする場合
抗血小板薬中止による影響
• Aspirin中止による心血管イベントリスクを評価したMeta.
 – 6 prospective cohort trialsのMeta-analysis, N=50279名.

 – 全体では, Aspirin中止による心血管イベントリスクRR 3.14[1.75-5.61]

 – 特に冠動脈ステント留置群では高リスクであり, RR89.78[29.9-269.6]

                                           European Heart Journal (2006) 27, 2667–2674

• 心血管系イベントの10.2%が直前にAspirin中止歴がある.
 – 周術期におけるAspirin中止の影響を評価したMeta-analysisでは,
  Aspirin中止∼各イベント発症までの期間は,
  急性冠動脈疾患               8.5±3.6d
  脳血管疾患                 14.3±11.3d
  末梢血管疾患                25.8±18.1d となる. 早いものでは中止後5日で発症.


                                          Journal of Internal Medicine 2005; 257: 399–414

More Related Content

What's hot

私の考える輸液療法
私の考える輸液療法私の考える輸液療法
私の考える輸液療法guest6c0cc90
 
カテコラミン
カテコラミンカテコラミン
カテコラミンHiroyuki Ote
 
急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】
急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】
急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】NEURALGPNETWORK
 
今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020
今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020
今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020Tsuneyasu Yoshida
 
Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測
Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測
Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測Ming Chia Lee
 
Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期
Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期
Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期NEURALGPNETWORK
 
第8回 「熱傷」
第8回 「熱傷」第8回 「熱傷」
第8回 「熱傷」清水 真人
 
加護病房藥師的查房日誌
加護病房藥師的查房日誌加護病房藥師的查房日誌
加護病房藥師的查房日誌Ming Chia Lee
 
心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】
心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】
心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】NEURALGPNETWORK
 
第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」
第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」
第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」清水 真人
 
ARDSに対してのステロイド投与について
ARDSに対してのステロイド投与についてARDSに対してのステロイド投与について
ARDSに対してのステロイド投与についてAkihiro Shiroshita
 
第1回 「めまい」
第1回 「めまい」 第1回 「めまい」
第1回 「めまい」 清水 真人
 
PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜
PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜
PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜Hideki Arimoto
 
Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης
 Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης
Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσηςΠαναγιώτα Γκογκόση
 

What's hot (20)

気管軟化症 EDAC
気管軟化症 EDAC気管軟化症 EDAC
気管軟化症 EDAC
 
私の考える輸液療法
私の考える輸液療法私の考える輸液療法
私の考える輸液療法
 
カテコラミン
カテコラミンカテコラミン
カテコラミン
 
抗生剤一覧
抗生剤一覧抗生剤一覧
抗生剤一覧
 
急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】
急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】
急性腎不全 地域で行う急性腎不全の鑑別と治療 【ADVANCED】
 
胸水検査 講義
胸水検査 講義胸水検査 講義
胸水検査 講義
 
NST概論講義
NST概論講義NST概論講義
NST概論講義
 
今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020
今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020
今すぐ使える血ガスの読み方2020
 
Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測
Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測
Aminoglycosides的血中濃度監測
 
Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期
Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期
Va23 2 喘息copd診断-慢性期
 
第8回 「熱傷」
第8回 「熱傷」第8回 「熱傷」
第8回 「熱傷」
 
めまい 中枢 Vs 末梢
めまい 中枢 Vs 末梢めまい 中枢 Vs 末梢
めまい 中枢 Vs 末梢
 
加護病房藥師的查房日誌
加護病房藥師的查房日誌加護病房藥師的查房日誌
加護病房藥師的查房日誌
 
腹水検査 講義用
腹水検査 講義用腹水検査 講義用
腹水検査 講義用
 
心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】
心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】
心肺停止蘇生後の管理【ADVANCED】
 
第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」
第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」
第5回 「痙攣,てんかん」
 
ARDSに対してのステロイド投与について
ARDSに対してのステロイド投与についてARDSに対してのステロイド投与について
ARDSに対してのステロイド投与について
 
第1回 「めまい」
第1回 「めまい」 第1回 「めまい」
第1回 「めまい」
 
PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜
PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜
PCASにおける集中治療管理〜sedationを中心に〜
 
Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης
 Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης
Κεφάλαιο 4 διαγώνισμα βιολογίας Γ λυκείου θετικης κατευθυνσης
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

ワーファリンの使い方
ワーファリンの使い方ワーファリンの使い方
ワーファリンの使い方
 
尿検査1
尿検査1尿検査1
尿検査1
 
タコツボ心筋症 講義
タコツボ心筋症 講義タコツボ心筋症 講義
タコツボ心筋症 講義
 
Gim
GimGim
Gim
 
E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎
E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎
E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎
 
研修医講義 「腎臓」 ~腎疾患へのアプローチ~
研修医講義 「腎臓」 ~腎疾患へのアプローチ~研修医講義 「腎臓」 ~腎疾患へのアプローチ~
研修医講義 「腎臓」 ~腎疾患へのアプローチ~
 
青春Again!! by若田部
青春Again!!  by若田部青春Again!!  by若田部
青春Again!! by若田部
 
鎖骨下動脈盗血症候群
鎖骨下動脈盗血症候群鎖骨下動脈盗血症候群
鎖骨下動脈盗血症候群
 
G 1 貧血3 巨赤芽球性
G 1 貧血3 巨赤芽球性G 1 貧血3 巨赤芽球性
G 1 貧血3 巨赤芽球性
 
結核の病態と治療(H25)
結核の病態と治療(H25)結核の病態と治療(H25)
結核の病態と治療(H25)
 
心不全の所見
心不全の所見心不全の所見
心不全の所見
 
かぜ症候群2012
かぜ症候群2012かぜ症候群2012
かぜ症候群2012
 
かぜ症候群2012 FINAL
かぜ症候群2012 FINALかぜ症候群2012 FINAL
かぜ症候群2012 FINAL
 
肺炎レクチャー
肺炎レクチャー肺炎レクチャー
肺炎レクチャー
 
肺炎の診断と治療(平成25年)
肺炎の診断と治療(平成25年)肺炎の診断と治療(平成25年)
肺炎の診断と治療(平成25年)
 
antiplatelet
antiplateletantiplatelet
antiplatelet
 
ECG lecture 1
ECG lecture 1ECG lecture 1
ECG lecture 1
 
WPW syndrome
WPW syndromeWPW syndrome
WPW syndrome
 
ECG lecture(後期研修医向け)
ECG lecture(後期研修医向け)ECG lecture(後期研修医向け)
ECG lecture(後期研修医向け)
 
経口抗凝固・抗血小板薬
経口抗凝固・抗血小板薬経口抗凝固・抗血小板薬
経口抗凝固・抗血小板薬
 

Similar to 高齢者への薬剤

3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx
3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx
3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptxjiregna5
 
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFRPitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFRRanjit Singh
 
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failureDose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failurePallavi Kurra
 
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptxNON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptxAnuj Satarkar
 
5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly
5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly
5th y dental special pk consideration in elderlyKAU
 
best Ckd presentation1 by Dr. sachin kr rana
best Ckd presentation1  by Dr. sachin kr ranabest Ckd presentation1  by Dr. sachin kr rana
best Ckd presentation1 by Dr. sachin kr ranaSachin Rana
 
GFR estimation.pptx
GFR estimation.pptxGFR estimation.pptx
GFR estimation.pptxssuserc6ee49
 
NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE
NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASENON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE
NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASEDr. Haritha Sridhar
 
Accuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCD
Accuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCDAccuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCD
Accuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCDRavi Kumudesh
 
Dosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptx
Dosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptxDosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptx
Dosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptxSaishDalvi
 
ICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim Treier
ICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim TreierICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim Treier
ICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim TreierKimberly Treier
 
Fatty liver KKD.pptx
Fatty liver KKD.pptxFatty liver KKD.pptx
Fatty liver KKD.pptxssuser99653c
 
Cystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study Presentation
Cystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study PresentationCystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study Presentation
Cystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study PresentationMary Rodavich
 
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptxNON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptxSangram Das
 
Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022
Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022
Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022Sidney Erwin Manahan
 

Similar to 高齢者への薬剤 (20)

3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx
3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx
3. Clinical Phk-Dosing in special Population & TDM.pptx
 
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFRPitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR
Pitfalls in estimating renal failure in the elderly by eGFR
 
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failureDose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
Dose Adjustment in renal and hepatic failure
 
Drug dosing
Drug dosingDrug dosing
Drug dosing
 
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptxNON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE.pptx
 
Cystatin c
Cystatin cCystatin c
Cystatin c
 
Polycystic ovary
Polycystic ovaryPolycystic ovary
Polycystic ovary
 
5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly
5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly
5th y dental special pk consideration in elderly
 
best Ckd presentation1 by Dr. sachin kr rana
best Ckd presentation1  by Dr. sachin kr ranabest Ckd presentation1  by Dr. sachin kr rana
best Ckd presentation1 by Dr. sachin kr rana
 
GFR estimation.pptx
GFR estimation.pptxGFR estimation.pptx
GFR estimation.pptx
 
NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE
NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASENON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE
NON ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE
 
Accuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCD
Accuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCDAccuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCD
Accuracy of Laboratory Parameters in Management of CKD and NCD
 
Dosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptx
Dosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptxDosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptx
Dosage regimen in renal failure ( Neha Mayekar).pptx
 
Nafld suresh ppt
Nafld suresh pptNafld suresh ppt
Nafld suresh ppt
 
ICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim Treier
ICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim TreierICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim Treier
ICU presentation - Hannah Bond and Kim Treier
 
Kideny function test
Kideny function testKideny function test
Kideny function test
 
Fatty liver KKD.pptx
Fatty liver KKD.pptxFatty liver KKD.pptx
Fatty liver KKD.pptx
 
Cystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study Presentation
Cystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study PresentationCystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study Presentation
Cystic Fibrosis Nutritional Case Study Presentation
 
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptxNON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptx
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISESEppt.pptx
 
Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022
Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022
Lupus Nephritis Guideline Review 2022
 

More from Katsushige Takagishi (20)

高齢者の掻痒感
高齢者の掻痒感高齢者の掻痒感
高齢者の掻痒感
 
Microvascular angina
Microvascular anginaMicrovascular angina
Microvascular angina
 
SLEと妊娠
SLEと妊娠SLEと妊娠
SLEと妊娠
 
Cryoglobulinemia
CryoglobulinemiaCryoglobulinemia
Cryoglobulinemia
 
免疫グロブリン遊離鎖 κ/λ比
免疫グロブリン遊離鎖 κ/λ比免疫グロブリン遊離鎖 κ/λ比
免疫グロブリン遊離鎖 κ/λ比
 
結膜炎 JAMA 2013
結膜炎 JAMA 2013結膜炎 JAMA 2013
結膜炎 JAMA 2013
 
Fulminant type 1 dm
Fulminant type 1 dmFulminant type 1 dm
Fulminant type 1 dm
 
強皮症腎クリーゼ
強皮症腎クリーゼ強皮症腎クリーゼ
強皮症腎クリーゼ
 
Crps
CrpsCrps
Crps
 
Whipple病
Whipple病Whipple病
Whipple病
 
伝染性単核症
伝染性単核症伝染性単核症
伝染性単核症
 
真性多血症 本態性血小板増多症
真性多血症 本態性血小板増多症真性多血症 本態性血小板増多症
真性多血症 本態性血小板増多症
 
熱中症
熱中症熱中症
熱中症
 
PSP
PSPPSP
PSP
 
肝膿瘍
肝膿瘍肝膿瘍
肝膿瘍
 
好中球減少性発熱
好中球減少性発熱好中球減少性発熱
好中球減少性発熱
 
血小板 Itp
血小板 Itp血小板 Itp
血小板 Itp
 
正常圧水頭症
正常圧水頭症正常圧水頭症
正常圧水頭症
 
多系統萎縮症
多系統萎縮症多系統萎縮症
多系統萎縮症
 
好酸球増多
好酸球増多好酸球増多
好酸球増多
 

高齢者への薬剤

  • 2. 高齢者への投薬 Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121 • 高齢者(≥65歳)では慢性疾患が多く, 内服している薬剤も多い • 米国では≥65歳の12%が10種類以上, 23%が5種類以上の薬剤が処方. 市販薬(OTC)も含めるともっと多くなる. • 若年と比較し, 3倍以上の薬剤使用量となる.
  • 3. 薬物動態の変化 Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445 • 薬物動態は, 吸収, 分布, 代謝, 排泄の4つで規定される. • 吸収; 加齢に伴い消化管蠕動, 血流は低下する.  胃酸の分泌も低下し, 胃内のpHは上昇する. • 血流低下, pH上昇により, 経口摂取された薬剤の吸収率は低下. • 一方で, 蠕動運動の低下は消化管通過時間が延長するため, 吸収率は上昇し, 血中濃度ピークまでの時間も延長.
  • 4. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121 • 分布容積の変化; 高齢者の体格, 組成の変化 • 高齢者では, 体重, Total body water(TBW)は低下し, 相対的に脂質の割合は増加. >65yでは毎年0.5%体重低下する. • 例えば80kgの75歳では体脂肪率29%, 一方で20歳の場合は15%のみ Med Clin N Am 95 (2011) 579–593 •  → Hydrophilic drugs(親水性の薬剤)の分布容積は低下する.   親水性薬剤であるジゴキシンやリチウム,   エタノールは同じ量でも血中濃度が増加する.  → Lipophilic drugs(脂質溶解性の薬剤)は脂肪組織へ分布し,   Vdは増加するものの蓄積による効果遷延のリスクが上昇   (ベンゾジアゼピン系) • 分布; アルブミン値の低下 • アルブミン結合性の薬剤では遊離体の増加を来たし, 作用が増強 (フェニトイン, テオフィリン, ワーファリン, ジゴキシン)
  • 5. 体格に応じた薬剤調節 • 例えば, 90kg, 190cmの患者は, 56kg, 150cmの患者と比較して約2倍の体積を有する. • 熱病では決まった投与量のみ記載されているが, 日本人との対格差, 近年の肥満患者の増加に対応できていない • 肥満患者と非肥満患者では薬剤の吸収率に差はないが, タンパク結合率, 分布体積は肥満患者で大きい. • また, 肥満患者では肝代謝が亢進する傾向にある Lancet 2010;375:248-51
  • 6. Hydrophilic(親水性) Lipophilic(親脂質性) βラクタム系 キノロン  ペニシリン, セフェム, マクロライド  モノバクタム, カルバペネム Lincosamides グリコペプチド テトラサイクリン アミノグリコシド チゲサイクリン ポリミキシン Co-trimoxazole フォスフォマイシン リファンピシン • 各抗生剤の親和性 クロラムフェニコール • 高齢者では親水性の薬剤のVdは減少 → 血中濃度が上昇し易い 新脂質性の薬剤のVdは増加するが, 蓄積し排泄は低下する. • 90歳の羸痩の強い寝たきり高齢者の誤嚥性肺炎, 例え予測ClCr >50だとしても, ABPC/SBT 3g q6hで投与するのはどうなんだろう? Lancet 2010;375:248-51
  • 7. 代謝の変化; 肝臓容積, 肝血流の低下 Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121 • 高齢者ではCytochrome P450も低下しており, 肝で代謝される薬剤は少量でも効果を示す様になる. (β阻害薬, TCA, Nitrateなど) • 排泄の変化; 腎機能(30台半ばからGFRは6-12mL/min/10y低下する) • Cockcroft-GaultのCCr計算式; (140-年齢)xWt / 72xCr (女性x0.85) 体重は理想体重を用いる • 日本人 70-74歳の平均身長は男性163.7cm, 女性151.4cm ここから理想体重を求めると男性59.6kg, 女性44.6kg • 高齢女性ではCre<1でも Cre 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 男性 281 141 94 70 56 47 腎機能は悪いかもしれない 女性 179 90 60 45 36 30
  • 8. 他のClCr推定方法 Table 1. Formulas available for estimating creatinine clearance1,14,15,17,18 Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445 Creatinine clearance estimate Formula Comments Cockcroft-Gault formula Estimated creatinine clearance (mL/min) = Widely used; Cockroft-Gault equation is used to make dosage adjustments, [140 j age (y) Â weight (kg)]/(72 Â SCr) because this is how drug manufacturers establish their dosing recommendations. This is mandated by the FDA. Multiply by 0.85 if female Use ideal body weight: The process of rounding the SCr concentration up by 1.0 mg/dL is not Men = 50 + (2.3 Â number of inches over 5 ft) supported by medical evidence. Women = 45.5 + (2.3 Â number of inches over 5 ft) Abbreviated Estimated glomerular filtration rate May be most effective in patients with diabetic kidney disease, patients MDRD equation (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186 Â serum creatinine with chronic kidney disease in middle age (average age 51 y), black (mg/dL) Y 1.154 Â age (y) Y 0.203: patients with hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and patients with & Â (0.742 if female) preexisting kidney disease. The MDRD equation is often used to stage patients’ degree of kidney dysfunction. & Â (1.210 if African American) Actual 24-h Time-consuming and increases work for nursing Pregnant women, patients with extremes of age and weight, patients with creatinine collection malnutrition, patients with skeletal muscle diseases, patients with paraplegia or quadriplegia, patients consuming a vegetarian diet and with rapidly changing kidney function Circumstances under which these equations are not effective for estimating renal function: extreme body weight: body mass index G19 or 935 kg/m2, significant muscle mass abnormality (amputations, loss of muscle mass, muscle disease, or paralysis), acute kidney failure, pregnancy, severe hepatopathy, generalized edema, or ascites. FDA, Food and Drug Administration; MDRD = modification of diet in renal disease; SCr = serum creatinine. commonly used calculation, although many practitioners prefer what would provide the most accurate estimation of a patient’s the MDRD formula, which may prove to be more accurate than creatinine clearance.20,21 other formulas even though it has not been used for as long as In summary, the altered pharmacokinetics observed in Cockroft-Gault. In elderly adults, a low serum creatinine is not most elderly patients significantly affect the particular phar- always indicative of normal renal function. Because older adults macokinetics of a drug. These changes are summarized in have lower muscle mass than younger people, low serum cre- Table 2. Although drug absorption is probably least affected
  • 9. 日本とアメリカの平均体重, 慎重の比較 年齢 男性 女性 65-69歳 62.95kg 164.5cm 53.04kg 152.4cm 70-74歳 62.27kg 163.7cm 51.34kg 151.4cm 75-79歳 60.16kg 162.0cm 50.18kg 149.7cm 平成22年度 体力, 運動能力調査 年齢 男性 女性 60-69歳 90.0kg 175.4cm 77.30kg 161.8cm 70-79歳 85kg 173.8cm 70.60kg 159.2cm ≥80歳 76.3kg 170.7cm 64.5kg 156.0cm CDC http://www.cdc.gov • このような母集団で評価されたRCT, trialsで投与量が決定されている これが日本人にそのまま当てはまるものか?
  • 10. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121 • 薬剤作用の減弱, 増強 • 加齢とも無い, 各組織での受容体数の変化, 感受性の変化があり, 作用が減弱, 増強することも分かっている. β阻害薬や刺激薬の効果は減弱し, ワーファリンやオピオイドの効果は増強することが判明している.
  • 11. 高齢者の薬物動態のまとめ Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445 Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121 変化 結果 胃酸分泌低下, pHの上昇 吸収 薬剤吸収率の低下 消化管血流の低下 消化管運動の低下 消化管内薬物残存, 吸収増加 分布 Total body water 低下, 体重減少 親水性薬剤のVd低下 親脂質性薬剤のVd上昇 脂肪組織の占める割合の上昇 排泄遅延 アルブミン低下 遊離体薬物の上昇 代謝 酵素誘導の低下, 肝組織減少, 肝血流低下 肝代謝の低下 Oxydase system活性の低下 排泄 GFRの低下, 腎血流低下 腎排泄の低下
  • 12. 高齢者で特に問題となりやすい薬剤 薬剤 問題 SU剤, インスリン 低血糖リスク ワーファリン 出血リスク 10歳加齢毎に0.5mg程度必要量が減る* ジゴキシン 食欲低下, 不整脈 ベンゾジアゼピン 意識障害, 転倒 高齢者では排泄遅延 抗ヒスタミン 意識障害, 尿閉 H2阻害薬 意識障害, 昏迷, 抑うつ 抗精神病薬 意識障害, 死亡リスク 抗うつ薬 意識障害, 便秘, 低血圧 抗てんかん薬 意識障害, 肝障害, 腎障害 NSAID 消化管出血, 腎不全 降圧薬 失神, 徐脈, 低血圧 利尿薬 脱水, 低血圧, 電解質異常 甘草 低K血症, 高血圧 JAMA 2010;304:1592-1601, Southern Medical Journal 2012;105:437-445 *Chest 2005;127:2049-56 MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 78:613–626, 2011 • 反対に, 意識障害, 低血糖, 尿閉, 便秘, 低血圧, 不整脈, 出血, 腎不全, 脱水, 電解質異常があれば薬剤性を先ず疑うべし.
  • 13. 健康食品による副作用 MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 78:613–626, 2011 健康食品, サプリ 問題 相互作用 HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, CoQ10 悪心, 下痢, 食欲低下 warfarin, 化学療法 エキナセア 頭痛, めまい, 悪心, 便秘, 肝障害 CYP3A4誘導 アスピリン, HIV protease阻害薬 ニンニク 出血, 低血糖, 消化管症状 CYP2E1阻害作用, CYP3A4誘導 抗凝固/抗血小板薬, Trazodone, イチョウ 出血, 悪心, 頭痛, 下痢, 動悸, 不安 NSAID, MAOI, 抗精神病薬, インスリン, CYP3A4と2C19阻害 インスリン, SU剤, 抗凝固薬, チョウセンニンジン 高血圧, 頻脈, 下痢, 低血糖 MAOI, イマチニブ, CYP3A4阻害 グルコサミン 消化管症状, 頭痛, 浮腫 不明 ベンゾジアゼピン, バルビツレート カバカバ(コショウ科) 鎮静, 肝障害, 意識障害 CYP2E1, 1A2, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4阻害 ノコギリヤシ 頭痛, 悪心, 下痢, 出血 抗凝固薬 ジルチアゼム, ニフェジピン, 下痢, 頭痛, 悪心, 昏迷, 西洋オトギリ草 ワーファリン, SSRI, TCA, 経口避妊薬, 不眠, 日光過敏 テオフィリン, CYP3A4, 2C9, 2C19, 2E1誘導 ベンゾジアゼピン, ハロペリドール セイヨウカノコソウ 鎮静, 頭痛, 離脱症状 CYP450, 2D6, 3A4阻害
  • 14. Polypharmacy Drugs Aging 2003;20:817-832 • Polypharmacy; 多剤服用 には主に3つのタイプがある. • Appropriate polypharmacy; 患者本人の疾患, 病態に対して  妥当といえる処方のみだが, 総量が多い場合 • Inappropriate polypharmacy; 疾患, 病態に対して  妥当とは言えない, 過度な処方がされている場合. • Redundant pseudopolypharmacy; 実際使用しているよりも多く,  患者が報告しているケース.  患者の誤解, 医師のカルテの記載ミス  (前のカルテを参照し続けているなど)が原因となる.
  • 15. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2007) 32, 113–121 • 多剤となる理由; • 高齢者の多彩な慢性疾患, 訴えに応じて処方されるパターン. • 複数の医師に処方され, しばしば同じ作用の薬剤が 処方されているパターン. • 薬剤の副作用を更に薬剤で対応されているパターン • アドヒアランス低下を効果不十分と判断され, 増量されているパターン.
  • 16. Drugs Aging 2003;20:817-832 • 多剤の使用の問題点は6つ. • 副作用の増加, アドヒアランスの低下, 薬剤間相互作用, Medication Errors  上記による入院率の増加, 医療費の増大. • 2剤使用すると副作用のリスクは13%, 4剤の使用では38%, 7剤以上の使用では82%まで上昇する. • 多剤では当然アドヒアランスも低下する.
  • 17. イタリアのRetrospective study Drug Aging 2010;27:1019-1028 • ≥65yの887165名のうち, 平均薬剤使用数は6.3±4.2 1-4剤使用例が39.3%, 5-7剤使用例が28.4%, 8-10剤使用例が17.4%, 11-14剤が10.2%, 15剤以上が4.7% • 高齢者ほどPolypharmacyのリスクは高い 65-74歳をReferenceとした時, 75-84歳ではOR 1.76[1.74-1.78] ≥85歳ではOR 1.83[1.80-1.85]
  • 18. 薬剤による副作用 • 内科入院の2.4-6.7%が薬剤の副作用によるもの. その大半が高齢者. • 高齢者の薬剤副作用のリスクは全体の3倍. 高齢者の再入院の20%は薬剤による副作用が原因との報告もある. その75%は薬剤を適切に使用すれば予防可能であった.
  • 19. 投薬のチェック方法 • Beers’ criteria;   • Beersが1991年に提唱した, 高齢者に害を及ぼす可能性のある 薬剤のリスト. 2012年にUpdateが発表されており, 以下のURLでDL可能 (http://www.americangeriatrics.org/health_care_professionals/clinical_practice/ clinical_guidelines_recommendations/2012) • 大量のため, 割愛. ポケットブックもDL可能であり, ポケットデバイスに入れておくと便利.
  • 20. Table 1 (continued from page 1) AGS BEERS CRITERIA TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Organ System/ Recommendation, Rationale, FOR POTENTIALLY INAPPROPRIATE Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Antispasmodics Avoid except in short-term palliative care to decrease MEDICATION USE IN OLDER ADULTS n Belladonna alkaloids oral secretions. n Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide FROM THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY n Dicyclomine Highly anticholinergic, uncertain effectiveness. n Hyoscyamine This clinical tool, based on The AGS 2012 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older n Propantheline QE = Moderate; SR = Strong Adults (AGS 2012 Beers Criteria), has been developed to assist healthcare providers in improving medication safety in n Scopolamine older adults. Our purpose is to inform clinical decision-making concerning the prescribing of medications for older adults in order to improve safety and quality of care. Antithrombotics Dipyridamole, oral short-acting* (does not Avoid. Originally conceived of in 1991 by the late Mark Beers, MD, a geriatrician, the Beers Criteria catalogues medications apply to the extended-release combination with May cause orthostatic hypotension; more effective alternatives that cause adverse drug events in older adults due to their pharmacologic properties and the physiologic changes of aspirin) available; IV form acceptable for use in cardiac stress testing. aging. In 2011, the AGS undertook an update of the criteria, assembling a team of experts and funding the develop- QE = Moderate; SR = Strong ment of the AGS 2012 Beers Criteria using an enhanced, evidence-based methodology. Each criterion is rated (qual- Ticlopidine* Avoid. ity of evidence and strength of evidence) using the American College of Physicians’ Guideline Grading System, which Safer, effective alternatives available. is based on the GRADE scheme developed by Guyatt et al. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong The full document together with accompanying resources can be viewed online at www.americangeriatrics.org. Anti-infective Nitrofurantoin Avoid for long-term suppression; avoid in patients with INTENDED USE CrCl <60 mL/min. The goal of this clinical tool is to improve care of older adults by reducing their exposure to Potentially Inappropri- Potential for pulmonary toxicity; safer alternatives available; lack of ate Medications (PIMs). n This should be viewed as a guide for identifying medications for which the risks of use in older adults outweigh concentration in the urine. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n These criteria are not meant to be applied in a punitive manner. n This list is not meant to supersede clinical judgment or an individual patient’s values and needs. Prescribing and Cardiovascular managing disease conditions should be individualized and involve shared decision-making. Alpha1 blockers Avoid use as an antihypertensive. n These criteria also underscore the importance of using a team approach to prescribing and the use of non- n Doxazosin High risk of orthostatic hypotension; not recommended as routine n Prazosin treatment for hypertension; alternative agents have superior risk/ pharmacological approaches and of having economic and organizational incentives for this type of model. n Implicit criteria such as the STOPP/START criteria and Medication Appropriateness Index should be used in n Terazosin a complementary manner with the 2012 AGS Beers Criteria to guide clinicians in making decisions about safe QE = Moderate; SR = Strong medication use in older adults. Alpha agonists - n Clonidine ers as listed. The criteria are not applicable in all circumstances (eg, patient’s receiving palliative and hospice care). If a clinician is n Guanabenz* High risk of adverse CNS effects; may cause bradycardia and n Guanfacine* orthostatic hypotension; not recommended as routine treatment of the medication as potentially inappropriate can serve as a reminder for close monitoring so that the potential for n Methyldopa* for hypertension. an adverse drug effect can be incorporated into the medical record and prevented or detected early. n Reserpine (>0.1 mg/day)* QE = Low; SR = Strong Antiarrhythmic drugs (Class Ia, Ic, III) n Amiodarone TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults n Dofetilide n Dronedarone Organ System/ Recommendation, Rationale, n Flecainide harms than rhythm control for most older adults. Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) n Ibutilide Anticholinergics (excludes TCAs) n Procainamide Amiodarone is associated with multiple toxicities, including thyroid First-generation antihistamines (as single Avoid. n Propafenone disease, pulmonary disorders, and QT interval prolongation. agent or as part of combination products) n Quinidine QE = High; SR = Strong n Brompheniramine Highly anticholinergic; clearance reduced with advanced age, and n Sotalol n Carbinoxamine tolerance develops when used as hypnotic; increased risk of confu- Disopyramide* Avoid. n Chlorpheniramine sion, dry mouth, constipation, and other anticholinergic effects/ Disopyramide is a potent negative inotrope and therefore may n Clemastine toxicity. induce heart failure in older adults; strongly anticholinergic; other n Cyproheptadine antiarrhythmic drugs preferred. n Dexbrompheniramine Use of diphenhydramine in special situations such as acute treat- QE = Low; SR = Strong n Dexchlorpheniramine ment of severe allergic reaction may be appropriate. n Diphenhydramine (oral) Dronedarone n Doxylamine heart failure. QE = High (Hydroxyzine and Promethazine), Moderate (All others); SR n Hydroxyzine = Strong n Promethazine Worse outcomes have been reported in patients taking drone- n Triprolidine general, rate control is preferred over rhythm control for atrial Antiparkinson agents Avoid. n Benztropine (oral) QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n Trihexyphenidyl Not recommended for prevention of extrapyramidal symptoms Digoxin >0.125 mg/day Avoid. with antipsychotics; more effective agents available for treatment of In heart failure, higher dosages associated with no additional Parkinson disease. may increase risk of toxicity. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
  • 21. Table 1 (continued from page 2) Table 1 (continued from page 3) TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Organ System/ Recommendation, Rationale, Organ System/ Recommendation, Rationale, Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Nifedipine, immediate release* Avoid. Nonbenzodiazepine Avoid chronic use (>90 days) hypnotics Benzodiazepine-receptor agonists that have adverse events similar Potential for hypotension; risk of precipitating myocardial ischemia. n Eszopiclone to those of benzodiazepines in older adults (e.g., delirium, falls, QE = High; SR = Strong n Zolpidem fractures); minimal improvement in sleep latency and duration. n Zaleplon QE = Moderate; SR = Strong Spironolactone >25 mg/day Avoid in patients with heart failure or with a CrCl <30 mL/min. Ergot mesylates* Avoid. Isoxsuprine* In heart failure, the risk of hyperkalemia is higher in older adults if QE = High; SR = Strong taking >25 mg/day. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong Endocrine Androgens Avoid unless indicated for moderate to severe Central Nervous System n Methyltestosterone* hypogonadism. Tertiary TCAs, alone or in combination: Avoid. n Testosterone Potential for cardiac problems and contraindicated in men with n Amitriptyline prostate cancer. n Chlordiazepoxide- Highly anticholinergic, sedating, and cause orthostatic hypotension; QE = Moderate; SR = Weak amitriptyline Desiccated thyroid Avoid. n Clomipramine to that of placebo. Concerns about cardiac effects; safer alternatives available. n QE = Low; SR = Strong n Imipramine QE = High; SR = Strong n Perphenazine-amitriptyline Estrogens with or without progestins Avoid oral and topical patch.Topical vaginal cream: Ac- n Trimipramine management of dyspareunia, lower urinary tract infec- - tions, and other vaginal symptoms. ond- (atypical) generation (see online for full list) non-pharmacologic options have failed and patient is Evidence of carcinogenic potential (breast and endometrium); lack threat to self or others. of cardioprotective effect and cognitive protection in older women. Evidence that vaginal estrogens for treatment of vaginal dryness is Increased risk of cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and mortality in safe and effective in women with breast cancer, especially at dos- persons with dementia. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong QE = High (Oral and Patch), Moderate (Topical); SR = Strong (Oral and Thioridazine Avoid. Patch),Weak (Topical) Mesoridazine Growth hormone Avoid, except as hormone replacement following pituitary Highly anticholinergic and greater risk of QT-interval prolongation. gland removal. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong Effect on body composition is small and associated with edema, arthralgia, carpal tunnel syndrome, gynecomastia, impaired fasting Barbiturates Avoid. glucose. n Amobarbital* n Butabarbital* QE = High; SR = Strong n Butalbital greater risk of overdose at low dosages. Insulin, sliding scale Avoid. n Mephobarbital* Higher risk of hypoglycemia without improvement in hyperglyce- n Pentobarbital* QE = High; SR = Strong mia management regardless of care setting. n Phenobarbital QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n Secobarbital* Megestrol Avoid. Benzodiazepines - Minimal effect on weight; increases risk of thrombotic events and Short- and intermediate-acting: nia, agitation, or delirium. possibly death in older adults. n Alprazolam QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n Estazolam Older adults have increased sensitivity to benzodiazepines and Sulfonylureas, long-duration Avoid. n decreased metabolism of long-acting agents. In general, all ben- n Chlorpropamide Chlorpropamide: prolonged half-life in older adults; can cause nOxazepam zodiazepines increase risk of cognitive impairment, delirium, falls, n Glyburide prolonged hypoglycemia; causes SIADH nTemazepam fractures, and motor vehicle accidents in older adults. Glyburide: higher risk of severe prolonged hypoglycemia in older nTriazolam adults. Long-acting: May be appropriate for seizure disorders, rapid eye movement QE = High; SR = Strong n Chlorazepate sleep disorders, benzodiazepine withdrawal, ethanol withdrawal, n Chlordiazepoxide severe generalized anxiety disorder, periprocedural anesthesia, Gastrointestinal n Chlordiazepoxide-amitriptyline end-of-life care. Metoclopramide Avoid, unless for gastroparesis. n Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide Can cause extrapyramidal effects including tardive dyskinesia; risk n Clonazepam QE = High; SR = Strong may be further increased in frail older adults. n Diazepam QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n Flurazepam n Quazepam Mineral oil, given orally Avoid. Potential for aspiration and adverse effects; safer alternatives avail- Chloral hydrate* Avoid. able. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong light of overdose with doses only 3 times the recommended dose. Trimethobenzamide Avoid. QE = Low; SR = Strong One of the least effective antiemetic drugs; can cause extrapyrami- Meprobamate Avoid. dal adverse effects. High rate of physical dependence; very sedating. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
  • 22. Table 1 (continued from page 4) Table 2 (continued from page 5) TABLE 1: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug- Organ System/ Recommendation, Rationale, Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome Therapeutic Category/Drug(s) Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Disease or Drug(s) Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence Syndrome (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Pain Medications Syncope Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) Avoid. Meperidine Avoid. Peripheral alpha blockers Not an effective oral analgesic in dosages commonly used; may n Doxazosin Increases risk of orthostatic hypotension or brady- cause neurotoxicity; safer alternatives available. n Prazosin cardia. QE = High; SR = Strong n Terazosin QE = High (Alpha blockers), Moderate (AChEIs,TCAs and Non-COX-selective NSAIDs, oral Avoid chronic use unless other alternatives are not effec- Tertiary TCAs antipsychotics); SR = Strong (AChEIs and TCAs),Weak n Aspirin >325 mg/day tive and patient can take gastroprotective agent (proton- (Alpha blockers and antipsychotics) n Diclofenac Chlorpromazine, thioridazine, and olan- n zapine n Etodolac Increases risk of GI bleeding/peptic ulcer disease in high-risk Central Nervous System n Fenoprofen n Ibuprofen corticosteroids, anticoagulants, or antiplatelet agents. Use of pro- Chronic Bupropion Avoid. n Ketoprofen ton pump inhibitor or misoprostol reduces but does not eliminate seizures or Chlorpromazine n Meclofenamate risk. Upper GI ulcers, gross bleeding, or perforation caused by epilepsy Clozapine n Mefenamic acid Maprotiline patients with well-controlled seizures in whom alter- n Meloxicam months, and in about 2%–4% of patients treated for 1 year. These Olanzapine native agents have not been effective. n Nabumetone trends continue with longer duration of use. Thioridazine n Naproxen Thiothixene QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n Oxaprozin QE = Moderate; SR = Strong Tramadol n Piroxicam Delirium All TCAs Avoid. n Sulindac Anticholinergics (see online for full list) n Tolmetin Benzodiazepines Avoid in older adults with or at high risk of delirium Chlorpromazine because of inducing or worsening delirium in older Indomethacin Avoid. Corticosteroids adults; if discontinuing drugs used chronically, taper to Ketorolac, includes parenteral Increases risk of GI bleeding/peptic ulcer disease in high-risk H2-receptor antagonist avoid withdrawal symptoms. groups (See Non-COX selective NSAIDs) Meperidine Of all the NSAIDs, indomethacin has most adverse effects. Sedative hypnotics QE = Moderate; SR = Strong QE = Moderate (Indomethacin), High (Ketorolac); SR = Strong Thioridazine Pentazocine* Avoid. Dementia Anticholinergics (see online for full list) Avoid. Opioid analgesic that causes CNS adverse effects, including confu- & cognitive Benzodiazepines Avoid due to adverse CNS effects. sion and hallucinations, more commonly than other narcotic drugs; impairment H2-receptor antagonists Avoid antipsychotics for behavioral problems of is also a mixed agonist and antagonist; safer alternatives available. Zolpidem dementia unless non-pharmacologic options have QE = Low; SR = Strong Antipsychotics, chronic and as-needed use failed and patient is a threat to themselves or others. Skeletal muscle relaxants Avoid. Antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk n Carisoprodol Most muscle relaxants poorly tolerated by older adults, because of of cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and mortality in n Chlorzoxazone anticholinergic adverse effects, sedation, increased risk of fractures; persons with dementia. n Cyclobenzaprine effectiveness at dosages tolerated by older adults is questionable. QE = High; SR = Strong n Metaxalone QE = Moderate; SR = Strong History Anticonvulsants Avoid unless safer alternatives are not avail- n Methocarbamol of falls or Antipsychotics n Orphenadrine fractures Benzodiazepines *Infrequently used drugs. Table 1 Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin Nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics Ability to produce ataxia, impaired psychomotor n Eszopiclone function, syncope, and additional falls; shorter-acting receptor blockers; CNS, central nervous system; COX, cyclooxygenase; CrCl, creatinine clearance; GI, gastroin- n Zaleplon benzodiazepines are not safer than long-acting ones. n Zolpidem secretion; SR, Strength of Recommendation; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; QE, Quality of Evidence QE = High; SR = Strong TCAs/SSRIs TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug- Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome Insomnia Oral decongestants Avoid. n Pseudoephedrine Disease or Drug(s) Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence n Phenylephrine Stimulants CNS stimulant effects. Syndrome (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) n Amphetamine Cardiovascular n Methylphenidate QE = Moderate; SR = Strong Heart failure NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors Avoid. n Pemoline Theobromines n Theophylline Nondihydropyridine CCBs (avoid only for - n Caffeine systolic heart failure) bate heart failure. Parkinson’s All antipsychotics (see online publica- Avoid. n Diltiazem disease tion for full list, except for quetiapine and Dopamine receptor antagonists with potential to n Verapamil QE = Moderate (NSAIDs, CCBs, Dronedarone), High (Thia- clozapine) worsen parkinsonian symptoms. zolidinediones (glitazones)), Low (Cilostazol); SR = Strong Pioglitazone, rosiglitazone Antiemetics Quetiapine and clozapine appear to be less likely to n Metoclopramide precipitate worsening of Parkinson disease. Cilostazol n Prochlorperazine Dronedarone n Promethazine QE = Moderate; SR = Strong
  • 23. Table 2 (continued from page 6) Table 2 (continued from page 7) TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug- TABLE 2: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults Due to Drug- Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome Disease or Drug-Syndrome Interactions That May Exacerbate the Disease or Syndrome Disease or Drug(s) Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence Disease or Drug(s) Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence Syndrome (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Syndrome (QE) & Strength of Recommendation (SR) Gastrointestinal Inhaled anticholinergic agents Avoid in men. Chronic Oral antimuscarinics for urinary inconti- Avoid unless no other alternatives. urinary tract constipation nence symptoms, Strongly anticholinergic drugs, except - n Darifenacin Can worsen constipation; agents for urinary incon- benign antimuscarinics for urinary incontinence tion. n Fesoterodine tinence: antimuscarinics overall differ in incidence of prostatic (see Table 9 for complete list). n Oxybutynin (oral) constipation; response variable; consider alternative hyperplasia QE = Moderate; SR = Strong (Inhaled agents),Weak (All n Solifenacin agent if constipation develops. others) n Tolterodine Stress or Alpha-blockers Avoid in women. n Trospium QE = High (For Urinary Incontinence), Moderate/Low (All mixed n Doxazosin Others); SR = Strong urinary in- n Prazosin Aggravation of incontinence. Nondihydropyridine CCB continence n Terazosin n Diltiazem QE = Moderate; SR = Strong n Verapamil Table 2 Abbreviations: CCBs, calcium channel blockers; AChEIs, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; CNS, central ner- First-generation antihistamines as single - agent or part of combination products tion; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; QE, Quality of Evidence n Brompheniramine (various) n Carbinoxamine n Chlorpheniramine TABLE 3: 2012 AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medications to Be Used with Caution in n Clemastine (various) Older Adults n Cyproheptadine Drug(s) Recommendation, Rationale, Quality of Evidence (QE) & Strength of Recommenda- n Dexbrompheniramine tion (SR) n Dexchlorpheniramine (various) Aspirin for primary preven- n Diphenhydramine tion of cardiac events n Doxylamine n Hydroxyzine QE = Low; SR = Weak n Promethazine n Triprolidine Dabigatran Anticholinergics/antispasmodics (see online for full list of drugs with strong anticholinergic properties) QE = Moderate; SR = Weak n Antipsychotics Prasugrel n Belladonna alkaloids n Clidinium-chlordiazepoxide n Dicyclomine risk older patients (eg, those with prior myocardial infarction or diabetes). n Hyoscyamine QE = Moderate; SR = Weak n Propantheline n Scopolamine Antipsychotics Use with caution. n Tertiary TCAs (amitriptyline, clomip- Carbamazepine Carboplatin May exacerbate or cause SIADH or hyponatremia; need to monitor sodium level ramine, doxepin, imipramine, and trimip- Cisplatin closely when starting or changing dosages in older adults due to increased risk. ramine) Mirtazapine History of Aspirin (>325 mg/day) Avoid unless other alternatives are not ef- SNRIs QE = Moderate; SR = Strong gastric or Non–COX-2 selective NSAIDs fective and patient can take gastroprotective SSRIs duodenal TCAs ulcers Vincristine May exacerbate existing ulcers or cause new/addi- Vasodilators Use with caution. tional ulcers. QE = Moderate; SR = Strong May exacerbate episodes of syncope in individuals with history of syncope. Kidney/Urinary Tract QE = Moderate; SR = Weak Chronic kid- NSAIDs Avoid. Table 3 Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone ney disease secretion; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SNRIs, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; stages IV May increase risk of kidney injury. SR, Strength of Recommendation; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; QE, Quality of Evidence and V Triamterene (alone or in combination) May increase risk of acute kidney injury. The American Geriatrics Society gratefully acknowledges the support of the John A. Hartford Foundation, QE = Moderate (NSAIDs), Low (Triamterene); SR = Strong Retirement Research Foundation and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (NSAIDs),Weak (Triamterene) AGS Urinary Estrogen oral and transdermal (excludes Avoid in women. incontinence intravaginal estrogen) THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY (all types) in Aggravation of incontinence. Geriatrics Health Professionals. women QE = High; SR = Strong www.americangeriatrics.org
  • 24. アドヒアランスのチェック MANAGING MEDICATIONS IN CLINICALLY COMPLEX ELDERS • アドヒアランスを障害する因子 JAMA. 2010;304(14):1592-1601 g Table 1. Barriers to Medication Adherence and Targeted Solutions i Barriers Potential Solutions a Forgetting to take; Use pill organizers, medication calendars, blister limited organizational packs, electronic dispensing devices; simplify c skills regimen and reduce pill burden; encourage i active family/caregiver involvement; use Internet-linked or electronic adherence aids e and reporting systems m Patient believes drug is Work collaboratively with patient to address c not needed, is concerns and establish shared goals of care; ineffective, or that provide educational (including literacy- p too many drugs appropriate) materials using teach-back c are being taken approach; assess drug effectiveness; simplify m regimen and reduce pill burden Difficulty taking Substitute with easier-to-use medications (eg, p (eg, opening pill liquid if trouble swallowing; ordering easy-off g bottles, swallowing) caps); simplify regimen and reduce pill i burden; use pill cutters, oral dosing syringes, insulin syringe magnification, spacer for i inhalers Cost Substitute with lower-cost medications (eg, G generic vs brand name) and reduce unnecessary ones; assess prescription drug M insurance and direct patient to apply for t low-income subsidy and prescription drug assistance programs h
  • 25. どの薬剤を切るべきか? creased compared with the control group. The present study tests the feasibility of applying the same algorithm in com- Discuss the following with the patient/guardian • 各患者背景, munity-dwelling elderly patients. An evidence-based consensus exists for using the Yes drug for the indication given in its current dosing rate リスク-ベネフィットを考慮し, METHODS in this patient’s age group and disability level, and the benefit outweighs all possible known adverse effects No/Not sure 中止,STUDY PARTICIPANTS 変更を決める. No Indication seems valid and relevant in this patient’s age S group and disability level T This prospective cohort study included consecutive elderly pa- O tients referred by their family physician or family for compre- Yes P D hensive geriatric assessments from February 2005 through June Yes R 2008 and excluded patients with advanced disease (cancer or Do the known possible adverse reactions of the drug U outweigh possible benefit in old, disabled patients? G noncancer) in whom the initial estimate of life expectancy was less than 3 months and patients in whom follow-up availabil- No • 入院というイベントは ity was shorter than 4 months. Participants were assessed and Yes recommendations were made on medications based on the Good Any adverse symptoms or signs that may be related to S the drug? H 薬剤調節の最も良い機会と Palliative–Geriatric Practice (GP-GP) algorithm (Figure).12 As- sessments were performed either at the day care center for se- No I F T nior citizens in Pardes Hana or at the patient’s home in Israel. T 捉えるべし. The rationale for recommendations was then explained and dis- Is there another drug that may be superior to the one in question? Yes O cussed in detail with each patient and/or guardian/family. They A N were informed of the pros and cons of each medication pre- No O scribed, the level of evidence for a positive benefit to risk ratio T Can the dosing rate be reduced with no significant risk? H and its possible impact on longevity and quality of life. Fol- E lowing this discussion and based on patient and/or guardian/ R family preferences and consent, detailed letters were sent to the No Yes D R family physicians with recommendations to stop as many “non– U Continue with the same dosing rate Reduce dose G life saving drugs” as possible for at least 3 months. When stop- ping a Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648-1654 appropriate, dose Arch drug therapy was not considered
  • 26. その患者背景, 状態に一致した 母集団での明確なEvidenceあり → 薬剤は継続. (実際殆ど無し) • 患者背景, 状態を考慮し, 妥当ではないと判断 → 中止. • 副作用が利点を上回る → 中止. • 副作用が認められるが, 利点が大きい場合 → 薬剤を変更 • 他の薬剤でもっと効果が高いものがる場合 → 変更 • 投薬を減量しても不利益が無いと考えられる場合 → 減量 Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648-1654
  • 27. 患者に応じた薬剤の調節 • ① 患者背景, 状態, 年齢, 余命を考慮し,  それぞれのプロブレム毎のゴールを決める(アウトカム設定) • ② 各プロブレムに対して投与されている薬剤が  そのアウトカムに沿っているか?   → 沿っていないならば変更, 中止すべき.   → プロブレムと投与薬剤が合っていない場合も中止 • ③ 薬剤の副作用のアセスメントし,  副作用と薬剤投与の利益を比較.   → 副作用の方が大きいならば中止 or 減量 or 変更 Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(18):1648-1654を一部改変
  • 28. palliative m medications Less Time Palliative those addre toms. Exam targets includ vention of m Trea maintenance efit tmen y l Ben tion, and tre tanc Goal t Tar xpec Unti s of get CA E Time Care Life WITH g ainin Rem These conce nents in a Appropriate prescribing l Medications expectancy More Time Curative goals of care (Figure 3) components Figure 3. The model shows that the 4 steps in medication decision making form a pyramid, visually representing the appropriate medications at any level. At the top are represented patients for whom others, yield • どの薬剤が必要になるかはそれぞれの患者で異なる. remaining life expectancy is limited, drugs should have the shortest time until benefit, goals of care are palliative, and treatment targets are focused on symptom management. Moving toward the bottom, the propriate m able limitatio base of appropriate medications expands as the patient’s life expectancy is longer, time until benefit may be longer, goals of care are more aggressive, and treatment targets are aimed more at preventive be made to d strategies. The bottom of the pyramid therefore contains all medications that are otherwise appropriate cations ident • 余命, 治療のゴール, 目的, 薬剤開始∼効果発現までの時間の4軸で according to existing criteria for patients 65 years and older. components 考える方法もある. (REPRINTED) ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 166, MAR 27, 2006 WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM 606 ©2006 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. • 例えば余命が2年なのに効果発現まで2年以上かかる治療は無意味 Downloaded From: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/ by JUNKO NAGASUE on 11/29/2012 Intern Med 2006;166:605-609 Arch
  • 29. Case 1; 75歳女性, HT, 変形性関節症, 2型DM. • ADLは自立しており, 余命は17年程度と予測(life tableより)  → 各問題点においてしっかりとマネージメントし,   Strokeや虚血性心疾患の予防, 変形性関節症の予防,   転倒リスクの回避, 骨粗鬆症のチェック, 治療などキッチリ必要 • DMに関しては低血糖リスクが低い薬剤の選択. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:605-609
  • 30. Case 2; 72歳男性, 重度心不全, COPDでHOT導入. • 予測余命は数ヶ月∼1年程度. この状態でいろいろ精査し, それぞれの病態に対応しても 効果発現までの期間も長く, 意味は乏しい. • むしろ緩和ケア, 対症療法を中心とすべきと言える. 呼吸苦や不安を緩和する為の薬剤, 気管支拡張薬など. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:605-609
  • 31. 例題 • 80歳男性, 脳 塞後, 認知症(血管性疑い)で寝たきり. 食事摂取は可能だがムセが多い. 2型糖尿病, 高血圧, 高脂血症の既往あり, かかりつけは他院. • そんな患者が誤嚥性肺炎にて入院. • 入院時の内服薬は, バルプロ酸, セロクエル, SU剤, CCB, スタチン, PPI, アスピリン, サアミオン • 薬剤調節をどう行う?
  • 32. (使用薬剤に対する)プロブレムを挙げよう • #糖尿病, #高血圧, #高脂血症 #脳血管性認知症, #脳 塞後 • それぞれのプロブレムに対応する薬剤は? プロブレム 使用薬剤 コメント 糖尿病 SU剤 高血圧 CCB 高脂血症 スタチン アスピリン 脳血管性認知症 ASAの潰瘍予防にPPI サアミオン 脳 塞後 アスピリン 上記と同じ バルプロ酸 その他 対応するプロブレムが無い? セロクエル
  • 33. ① それぞれのアウトカムは? • 前提として, この患者さんの状況は, 80歳寝たきりで, 余命も数年あるかどうか. コミュニケーションは困難で, かろうじて食事可能. プロブレム アウトカム(建前) 状況に合わせたアウトカム(本音) キッチリとHbA1cを押さえる 高齢, 余命も数年 糖尿病 (HbA1c 7%前後) 低血糖だけは起こさない様にしたい... キッチリとBP <130/90へ 高血圧 あまり頑張りすぎて低血圧になっても... 降圧薬は(Level 1A) LDL-chol<80にしたいところ 高脂血症 スタチンは14%再発を減らす, けど... スタチンは(Level 1B) 脳血管性認知症 脳 塞予防 アスピリンは 抗血小板薬は必須 1000人に7名で再発を減らす 脳 塞後 (Level IA) 死亡率は1000人に4名減らす 出血は1000人に2名 Lancet Neurol 2011;10: 357–71
  • 34. ② アウトカムと薬剤の関係 プロブレム 状況に合わせたアウトカム(本音) 使用薬剤 アセスメント 高齢, 余命も数年 SU剤は低血糖の高リスク, 糖尿病 低血糖だけは起こさない様にした SU剤 高齢者での使用はどうか? い... あまり頑張りすぎて低血圧に CCB程度ならば問題無いかも. 高血圧 CCB なっても... 日頃の血圧をモニタリングし判断 効果的ではあるが, スタチンは14%再発を減らす, 高脂血症 スタチン この患者に必須かと言われると微 けど... 妙 脳血管性 一応, 誤嚥を減らすとの弱いエビ サアミオン 認知症 デンスはある* アスピリンは 1000人に7名で再発を減らす この数字と余命と出血リスクを 脳 塞後 アスピリン 死亡率は1000人に4名減らす どう考えるか? 出血は1000人に2名 バルプロ酸 これについては情報が無く その他 セロクエル さらに聴取する必要がある *Medicine 2011;90: 279-283
  • 35. ここまでのアセスメントでの薬剤調節; • 糖尿病に対してはSU剤から低血糖リスクの少ない他のピオグリタゾ ンやメトフォルミンへ変更を試してみる方針とした. • 高血圧に対するCCBは継続. 高脂血症に対するスタチンは中止. • 脳 塞に対するアスピリンは迷ったあげく残し, サアミオン(Nicegoline)は誤嚥リスクが高いので, 藁へもすがる思いで残した. • 問題は投与理由が不明なバルプロ酸とセロクエル
  • 36. 薬剤の病歴を詳しく聴取(From 家族, 前医) • 認知症が特に増悪したのは2-3年前. その際 不穏, 昼夜逆転, 叫び声, 興奮が強く, 家族がかなり困った. 主治医に相談し, 眠剤や抗精神病薬が試され, その際バルプロ酸, セロクエルが開始. 痙攣はした事はありません • それら開始後から徐々に不穏や昼夜逆転は消失し, 活気も低下してきた気がする. • 誤嚥やムセがひどくなったのは1-2年前から, あ, そう言えばその薬が始まって落ち着いた時期だったかしら?
  • 37. 入院後, バルプロ酸, セロクエルは一旦中止し, 経過観察. • 誤嚥性肺炎治療と同時にSTリハビリも開始. • 入院後からは幾分活気が戻り, 問いかけ対する反応も良好に. STリハビリにて刻み食も良好に摂取できる様になり, 家人から見ても明らかに反応が良くなったと. • ムセも無く, 食事摂取良好となったが, 身体機能は廃用症候群にてあまり改善なく, 退院となった. • 今回の薬剤調節; • スタチン, バルプロ酸, セロクエル中止. (サアミオンも止められたかも...)
  • 38. Clinical pearl • 抗てんかん薬が入っている場合, 必ず, しつこく, 何時, どこで, どのタ イミングにてんかん発作があったのかは確認すべきである.  しばしばてんかんが無いのに他の理由で薬剤が入り, 中止できず に意識障害の原因となっていることがある. • 抗精神病薬も同様, 何故入っているのかは常に意識しなさい. Katsushige Takagishi
  • 39. 反対に急に中止するとダメな薬剤は? 薬剤 理由 対応 抗パーキンソン薬* 悪性症候群のリスク 徐々に漸減させる ステロイド 副腎不全のリスク 徐々に漸減させる ベンゾジアゼピン(大量の) 離脱のリスク 徐々に漸減させる 心不全に対するβ阻害薬 心不全増悪のリスク 中止必要な場合は循環器併診 虚血性心疾患に対する抗血小板薬§ 虚血性心疾患のリスク 中止必要な場合は循環器併診 * Levodopa, Dopamine agonist, COMT阻害薬(Catechol-O-Methyl transferase) § DES留置後12mo以内の2剤療法 → 1剤への変更と,  全期間における1剤療法 → 中止とする場合
  • 40. 抗血小板薬中止による影響 • Aspirin中止による心血管イベントリスクを評価したMeta. – 6 prospective cohort trialsのMeta-analysis, N=50279名. – 全体では, Aspirin中止による心血管イベントリスクRR 3.14[1.75-5.61] – 特に冠動脈ステント留置群では高リスクであり, RR89.78[29.9-269.6] European Heart Journal (2006) 27, 2667–2674 • 心血管系イベントの10.2%が直前にAspirin中止歴がある. – 周術期におけるAspirin中止の影響を評価したMeta-analysisでは, Aspirin中止∼各イベント発症までの期間は, 急性冠動脈疾患 8.5±3.6d 脳血管疾患 14.3±11.3d 末梢血管疾患 25.8±18.1d となる. 早いものでは中止後5日で発症. Journal of Internal Medicine 2005; 257: 399–414