3. TABLE 2
Assessment of lupus flares in pregnancy
Feature
Findings Indicative of a Lupus Flare
Findings of Normal Pregnancy That Can Mimic a Flare
Clinical
Active rash of lupus
Inflammatory arthritis
Lymphadenopathy
Fever Ͼ38°C (not related to
infection or drug)
Pleuritis
Pericarditis
Erythrocycle sedimentation rate
Increased
Anemia
Hemoglobin Ͻ10.5 gm/dL
Thrombocytopenia
Urinalysis
Proteinuria
dsDNA antibodies
Complement
Platelet count Ͻ95,000
Hematuria or cellular casts
͓Ն͔300 mg/d
Rising titers
͓Ն͔25% drop
Fatigue
Arthralgias
Bland effusions of knees
Myalgias
Malar and palmar erythema
Postpartum hair loss
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Edema of hands, legs, and face
Mild resting dyspnea
18 – 46 mm/h Ͻ20 weeks’ gestation
30 –70 mm/h ͓Ն͔20 weeks’ gestation 17
Hemoglobin Ͼ11 gm/dL during first 20 weeks’ gestation
Hemoglobin Ͼ10.5 gm/dL h after 20 weeks’
gestation18
Mild in approximately 8%19
Rare hematuria from vaginal contamination
Ͻ300 mg/d
Negative or stable titers
Usually increased
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 2011;66:639-653
•
SLE再燃の症状と, それをマスクする可能性がある妊娠による症状
13年11月14日木曜日
4. otein should be a
in synthesis also
n result in higher
mponents as well
ad to a substantial
entation rate in a
ia from lupus gloficult. Both may
ia, hypertension,
on in renal funcdition, the 2 con-
•
TABLE 5
Differentiation of active lupus nephritis from preeclampsia
Active Lupus Nephritis
Hypertension
Proteinuria
Urinary sediment
Uric acid
DNA antibody levels
24-h urine calcium
Complement levels
Soluble FMS-like
tyrosine kinase 1
Preeclampsia
Onset before 20 weeks Onset after 20
weeks
Ն300 mg/d
Ն300 mg/dL
Active
Inactive
Յ5.5 mg/dL
Ͼ5.5 mg/dL
Rising
Stable or
negative
Ն195 mg/d
Ͻ195 mg/d
Ն25% drop
Normal
Normal
Elevated
ループス腎炎の活性化と子癇発作の違い
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 2011;66:639-653
13年11月14日木曜日
5. TABLE 6
Differentiation of microangiopathies in lupus pregnancy
Features*
Usual time of onset
Fever
Abdominal pain and other
symptoms
Jaundice
Central nervous system
involvement
Lung involvement
Elevated liver enzymes
Elevated bilirubin
Hepatic infarcts
Hypertension
Proteinuria
DIC
Microangiopathic hemolytic
anemia
Thrombocytopenia
Hypoglycemia
ADAMTS-13 Ͻ5%
HELLP†
Ͼ34 weeks, including postpartum
Absent
60%– 80%
5%–10%
40%– 60%
Rare
100%
50%– 60%
With antiphospholipid
antibodies
80%
90%–95%
5%–56%
50 –100%
Usually Ͼ20,000
Absent
Absent
AFLP‡
Ͼ27 weeks
25%–32%
35%–50%
40%–90%
30%– 40%
Rare
100%
100%
50%
30%–50%
73%
15–20%
None initially
Common
Absent
TTP§
CAPS¶
Late second to early
third trimester
20%–50%
Common
Second or third trimester
or postpartum
10%
Common
Rare
Not reported
60%
66%
Rare
Usually mild
100%
73%
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
20%–75%
Common
Rare
100%
Not reported
Common
20%
With concomitant HELLP
Usually Ͻ20,000
Absent
33%–100%
60%
Absent
Not reported
Adapted from references.98–101
†
Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets.
‡
Acute fatty liver of pregnancy.
§
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
¶
Catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.
•
SLE患者の妊娠で生じ得る Microangiopathyの鑑別
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 2011;66:639-653
13年11月14日木曜日
9. •
Lupus anticoagulant
BLOOD, 18 JULY 2013 x VOLUME 122, NUMBER 3
There were significantly more patients with a
history of TEs in the
LAC-positive group compared with
(LAC)による妊娠合併症のリスクpatients in2013;122(3):341-347
Blood. the LAC-negative
group (33.9% vs 2.9%; P 5 .001; 95% CI for the difference, .238-.382;
Table 1. Distribution of diagnoses among LAC-positive and
OR, 21.2; 95% CI, 8.8-51.1). There were significantly more LACLAC-negative patients
positive patients with a history of stillbirth (38.0% vs 7.1%; P , .001;
LAC negative,
LAC positive,
95% CI, .283-.477;340 (%) 95% CI, 4.2-17.5) and significantlyCI)
OR, 8.6;
fewer
Diagnosis
n5
n 5 62 (%)
P (95%
with a history of >2 early spontaneous losses (28.0% vs 71.8%;
SLE
66 (19.4)
13 (21.0)
NS
P , .001; 95% CI, .287-.569) compared with LAC-negative patients,
1° APS
0 (0)
24 (38.7)
,.001 (0.322-0.452)
respectively (Table 2). Significantly more LAC-positive women had
SLE/APS
3 (0.9)
13 (21.0)
,.001 (0.147-0.255)
pregnancies complicated by IUGR (8.0) HELLP,.001 (0.489-0.755)
and
compared with
Early RPL
238 (70.0)
5
LAC-negative women, but no apparent difference in the frequency
Other
33 (9.7)
7 (11.3)
NS
of preeclampsia was observed between the 2 groups. There was no
RPL, early recurrent pregnancy loss; NS, not significant; SLE/APS, lupus with
secondary APS.
Table 2. Distribution of clinical events among LAC-positive and
LAC-negative patients
test results (Figure 1): 62 (2.7%) had repeatedly tested positive for
LAC negative, LAC positive,
LAC; 31event
(1.4%) tested positive for LAC(%) only 1Poccasion and
on
Clinical
n 5 340 (%)
n 5 62
(95% CI)
subsequently tested negative; 43 (1.9%) tested positive with no
TE (idiopathic)
4 (1.2)
10 (16.1)
,.001 (0.085-0.182)
subsequent tests, as they were lost to 11 (17.7) ,.001 (0.113-0.217)
follow-up; and 2121 (94.0%)
TE (with risk factor*)
6 (1.8)
tested negative for LAC at (7.1) once. (38.0) ,.001 (0.283-0.477)
$1 stillbirth
23/326 least 19/50
$2 early SA
234/326 (71.8)
14/50 (28.0)
,.001 (0.287-0.569)
IUGR
3/326 (0.9)
9/50 (18.0)
,.001 (0.119-0.223)
Comparison of LAC-positive and LAC-negative patients
HELLP
TE; thrombotic event
13年11月14日木曜日
1/326 (0.3)
6/50 (12.0)
,.001 (0.077-0.157)
Preeclampsia
6/326 (1.8)
.186 (20.087-0.003)
Patients in the LAC-positive group3/50 (6.0)significantly older than
were
$1
230/326 (70.6)
thoselive birth LAC-negative group36/50 (72.0) 40 .972 (20.149 to 0.121)
in the
(median,
vs 37 years, reNo adverse obstetric
31/326 (9.5)
5/50 (10.0)
.884 (20.092 to 0.082)
spectively; P , .001, Mann-Whitney rank-sum test). No difference
events
was observed in the prevalence of patients with SLE in either group
SA, spontaneous respectively) (Table 1). However, there were
(21.0% vs 19.0%, abortion.
*Predisposing events for
significantly more patientsthrombosis: oral contraception, surgery, and postwith either primary or secondary APS in
partum period.
the LAC-positive group (60% vs 1%) and significantly more patients
18. Lupus and Pregnancy Y CME Review Article
外来でのモニタリング
647
TABLE 4
Monitoring of the pregnant lupus patient
Type of Monitoring
Timing During Gestation
Testing
Clinic visit: obstetrician
Conception to 20 weeks: monthly
20 –28 weeks: every 2 weeks
28 weeks to delivery: every week
Clinic visit: rheumatologist
Laboratory
Monthly
Initial assessment
Standard prenatal visit
Standard registration and 28 week labs
Assessment at each visit for signs and symptoms
of lupus
Clinical assessment
Complete blood count
Chemistry panel
Serum urate level
Urinalysis
Spot or 24-h urine protein-to-creatinine ratio
C3, C4, CH50
dsDNA antibodies
SS-A and SS-B antibodies
Cardiolipin antibodies
Lupus anticoagulant assay (e.g., Russell viper
venom test)
Complete blood count
Chemistry panel
Serum urate level
Urinalysis
C3, C4, CH50
dsDNA antibodies
24-h or spot urine protein to creatinine ratio if urine
dipstick positive
Assessment of crown-rump length
Fetal anatomy scan
Monitoring for fetal growth disturbances and
oligohydramnios
Monthly
Sonography
Fetal surveillance
Fetal m-mode echocardiography
(in setting of maternal SS-A
(Ro) and/or SS-B (La)
antibodies)
7–13 wk
16 –20 wk
Then every 4 weeks (or every 3
weeks in setting of preeclampsia or suspected IUGR)
At 26 –28 weeks, and then weekly
until birth
Weekly beginning at 16 weeks
and continuing till delivery
IUGR indicates intrauterine growth retardation.
13年11月14日木曜日
Nonstress test to start at 28 weeks
Biophysical profile to start at 26 weeks
Fetal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry to start at
26 weeks
Assessment for heart block
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 2011;66:639-653
19. •
SLEで使用する可能性がある薬剤と妊婦への影響
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 2011;66:639-653
Lupus and Pregnancy Y CME Review Article
645
TABLE 3
Use of drugs in lupus pregnancy
Drug
FDA Pregnancy-Risk
Category
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs)
Hydroxychloroquine
C
Nonfluorinated corticosteroids
(e.g., prednisone,
methylprednisolone)
Fluorinated corticosteroids (e.g.,
betamethasone and
dexamethasone)
Intravenous pulse
methylprednisolone
Leflunomide
B
C
May lead to constriction of fetal
ductus arteriosus.
Considered safe in doses used to
treat lupus
Associated with a small risk of orofacial clefts
Recommendation for Use During
Pregnancy
Avoid, especially in third
trimester
Continue to prevent lupus flares
Treatment of severe flares
C
Cross the placenta
Use only if intent is to treat fetus
B
May reach the fetus
Treatment of severe flares
X
High rate of fetal anomalies in rodent studies but 9.3% in registry
of rheumatoid arthritis patients (compared with 13% for
control RA group and 3.5% for
healthy women)70
Estimated congenital anomaly rate
of 10%–15% with doses used for
rheumatic disease.71 Discontinue
at least 3 menstrual cycles before
attempting to conceive
Use in first trimester associated with
malformations and miscarriage
Contraindicated
Methotrexate
X
Cyclophosphamide
D
13年11月14日木曜日
Maternal and Fetal Outcomes
Related to Use During Pregnancy
Contraindicated
Use only when mother’s life is at
risk and other options
20. Cyclophosphamide
D
Cyclosporine
C
Azathioprine
D
Intravenous immunoglobulin
C
Mycophenolate mofetil
D
Bisphosphonates
C
Warfarin
X
Rituximab
C
attempting to conceive
Use in first trimester associated with
malformations and miscarriage
Use in second and third trimesters associated with growth
retardation, suppression of fetal
hematopoiesis, impaired neurological development.
No increased risk of congenital
anomalies. May be associated
with increased rates of prematurity. Often used during pregnancy
by women with organ transplants
May be associated with IUGR
Studies in women with multiple
sclerosis and antiphospholipid
antibody syndrome have not revealed any fetal risk.
Increased risk for congenital anomalies, including facial dysmorphia
and malformation of the ears
Cross the placenta; effects on neonatal bone metabolism are
unknown.
Teratogenic in the first trimester
Associated with transient B-cell depletion in fetus if administered to
mother in second or third trimester
Use only when mother’s life is at
risk and other options
exhausted.
May be used for treatment of
lupus
Long track record of use in lupus pregnancies
May be used for certain lupus
manifestations
Contraindicated
Discontinue before conception
Switch to heparin before
attempting to conceive
May be used for certain lupus
manifestations
FDA pregnancy-risk categories: A, no risk in adequate controlled trials of pregnant women; B, no risk to fetus demonstrated in animal
reproduction studies or adverse effect noted in animal studies but no risk evident in controlled trials of pregnant women; C, no data in
humans are available and animal studies either positive for fetal risk or have not been conducted; D, evidence of human fetal risk exists,
but the potential benefit outweighs the potential risk to the fetus; X, risk associated with the use of the drug clearly outweighs any
positive benefit.72,73
IUGR indicates intrauterine growth retardation.
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY 2011;66:639-653
13年11月14日木曜日