Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
ERATA
Lectori Salutem. Over all these years there was one mistake in interpretation mine of
anatomy, recently one doctor w...
So I had confused the Cisterna Magna with the Large Side-Brain-Ventricles. But for the case in itself
this does not differ...
Dia Sana and MRI are comparable matching scans.
(The indication of two surgeries one after the other fits with what I hear...
These are signs of manipulation in the productions process with double negatives copied through as
RX photography is simil...
You’ve finished this document.
Download and read it offline.
Upcoming SlideShare
Etapas del manejo de información anorexia.docx
Next
Upcoming SlideShare
Etapas del manejo de información anorexia.docx
Next
Download to read offline and view in fullscreen.

Share

ERATA AND SUMMARY (ten years after starting investigation)

Download to read offline

SUMMARY OF WRITINGS Medical Research A, B and C, WITH A MINOR CORRECTION IN INTERPRETATION OF ANATOMY. Still the case stands, because surgery on the right half side of the brain, after making a hole at the left side, was performed without patient conscent and kept hidden after. RX manipulation tot frustrate the investigation after is also as finding supporting the case. THE CASE STILL STANDS in spite of counyter-actions. What is there more to be found? Thank you Slideshare for your democratic tool!

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

ERATA AND SUMMARY (ten years after starting investigation)

  1. 1. ERATA Lectori Salutem. Over all these years there was one mistake in interpretation mine of anatomy, recently one doctor who was juridical allowed to speak, pointed me to at that fact. I had been mistaking the left Side-Brain-Ventricle for the Cisterna Magna. Mistake or not, proving illegal medical activities nevertheless still stands as one doctor already mentioned, while he was not allowed to mention what those errors were. Officially there was only to cut in the Cisterna Maga at the left side of the head, but scan images show hidden deeds. And the X-ray manipulations were also not done just for fun too: there is something to conceal! The first specialist who was supporting me, ten years ago, I saw her repeatedly ticking with a pen on the real spot of the Cisterna Magna, not allowed mentioning my mistake; she was by professional obligation to protect the image of profession first by silence. As another doctor who had studied all my writings in 2013 remarked, that there are some errors in my script (which is nearly a scientific publication anyhow), but you’re not a neurologist, and this indeed is a case. He asked me not publish any more findings, to allow building up the case further in silence. Thus explaining my silence after. One thing is to add in conclusion on my study about the professional obligation not to speak: while investigating the illegal medical activities was going, with support of a few doctors, they appeared not to be allowed to speak about my error of anatomic interpretation. Underneath is an abridged overview of findings, which are to be found to in the foregoing writings Medical Research A.B and C. There are some findings to be added, but those we keep that for the judge now first, but they will become open, because the obligation of silence should not be used to conceal blamable activities. Before the surgeries: white arrow points to Falx-Cerebelli; black arrow = after: cyst has passed Falx-C . The white horizontal arrow is the real direction of actual surgery in the Falx Cerebelli cutting the Sinus Rectus. The white arrow downward at the left image is the official direction of surgery as reported. Cutting in the Falx Cerebelli was 1st , followed by other hidden actions. Sinus Rectus
  2. 2. So I had confused the Cisterna Magna with the Large Side-Brain-Ventricles. But for the case in itself this does not differ, because -either performing surgery forward inside or downward inside on the left side- in spite surgery was performed just over the middle at the right side in the head going underneath the skull after making a hole at the left side. This performance is not by accident because then also a hole over the middle of the skull was made. (Regarding that anatomy interpretation- error: Actually my medical dictionary was not that clear on that point and I had picked the wrong brain-fluid chamber, taking for being the largest. In all those years I was visiting physicians, nobody did correct me on that point, that I was mistaking the left side-ventricle for the Cisterna Magna.) Note: it is said that a surgeon can decide at any time to change aspects to treat a patient. But there was no emergency at that moment to act without patient consent, and the patient could have been informed afterwards too, but first of all in arguments, also if so, then when decided a hole made at the right side would simplifying surgery. Therefore this is first evidence of hidden medical activities. A huge scar in the neck for a minor surgery right under the scull, with several body foreign parts in the neck to be found after? Seen the specialists remained silent when I started questioning, I started to study myself on the scans for understanding. This was also a learning process without teacher. The blood-vain being hit indeed was the Vene Sinus Rectus, after cutting into the Falx Cerebelli. Body-Foreign material ? Missing Sinus Rectus ? Ferro traces going from neck to vertebral
  3. 3. Dia Sana and MRI are comparable matching scans. (The indication of two surgeries one after the other fits with what I heard when at the intesive care.) There is also foreign-body material to be found inside the head at the skull basis, which did not sink down. In order to define the location; therefore this scan-comparing with the size and location of the venes and the shape of the head. Three matching scan images made this approx comparing possible. If there was nothing to hide from activities in the neck, why then X-ray manipulation is performed? Two surgeries one after another? Enlargement from the MRI scout- scan November 2007. Sinus transversus not functioning? Sinus Rectus is more times cut off. Foreign material inside the head.
  4. 4. These are signs of manipulation in the productions process with double negatives copied through as RX photography is similar to regular photography, also regarding the negatives-production-process. Double nametag is a sign of manipulation of negatives in production with double prints. ZHS1S ZHS2S The Kodak RX brand information is running away, and some brand information is mirrored on ZHS2S. So again I had confused the Cisterna Magna with the Large Side-Brain-Ventricles. But if this mistake of interpretation of anatomy was used to keep the whole case down with that minor argument, then a finding of secondary offending is too. Frustration of the process of justice would not be needed, if there was nothing to prove. So in spite of that single error, implicitly there is recognition of proof. In Medical investigation part C I explained the impossibility a vain clip sagging down from inside the head towards inside the Spinal Canal, ending up even in between the second and third vertebral. Beware: Army Instruction! Check and question yourself and others, and keep each other sharp. Never give up; it is better dying with a bullet in the belly then in the back. Be warned, be prepared. Next to a different position of the clip and reaching even outside the vertebral body; ZHS1S shows a messy Posterior Arch and a C2 Pocessus Spinoza in comparison with ZHS2S, all being signs of a manipulation. There is very little space in the Spinal Canal between the layers of membranes and the nerve cord wrapped within. / Sagging down through the Arachnoid membrane is most unlikely. Questioning sagging down, but if so why RX manipulations after Arachnoid ?
  • adaqcra

    Jan. 5, 2017

SUMMARY OF WRITINGS Medical Research A, B and C, WITH A MINOR CORRECTION IN INTERPRETATION OF ANATOMY. Still the case stands, because surgery on the right half side of the brain, after making a hole at the left side, was performed without patient conscent and kept hidden after. RX manipulation tot frustrate the investigation after is also as finding supporting the case. THE CASE STILL STANDS in spite of counyter-actions. What is there more to be found? Thank you Slideshare for your democratic tool!

Views

Total views

495

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

0

Actions

Downloads

1

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

1

×