SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track
UNESCO 1 - “Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention: A decade after the entry into force”
1. Intangible Cultural
Heritage Convention:
A decade after the entry
into force.
Tenth Annual Meeting of the South-East European
Experts Network on Intangible Cultural Heritage
Brač - CROATIA
14-15 June 2016
3. 3
How is the Convention being
implemented at national level?
Creating a legal
and administrative
context for
safeguarding
Awareness-raising
Identifying, defining
and inventorying
living traditions
Establishing
partnerships to
safeguard the
ICH present in
territory of State
Party
7. 7
Lists of the Convention…
• 336 elements inscribed on the Representative List
• 43 elements inscribed on the Urgent Safeguarding List
• 12 programs / projects / activities selected for the
Register of Best Safeguarding Practices
• Clear imbalance in favour of the
Representative List
• Although it has contributed to raising
awareness and impact on safeguarding ICH
8. 8
Inscribed elements –
regional imbalance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Western
Europe and
North
America
Eastern
Europe
Latin
America
and the
Caribbean
Asia and
Pacific
Africa Arab States
Representative List
Urgent Safeguarding List
Register of Best Safeguarding Practices
11. 11
Partnerships
• 8 Category 2 Centres under the
auspices of UNESCO for Intangible
Cultural Heritage
• 11 UNESCO Chairs in the field of ICH
• Need to encourage tertiary education,
including postgraduate level of ICH
safeguarding studies
• Collaboration with WHO, WIPO and
the World BankParticipants of the Fourth Meeting
of ICH category-2 centers
12. 12
Recent developments
• 12 Ethical Principles
• Operational Directives on ICH and
Sustainable Development in line with the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development
• Improved access to International Assistance
13. 13
Just adopted- Chapter on ICH
and sustainable development
• Inclusive social development
• Environmental sustainability
• Inclusive economic development
• Peace and security
14. 14
International assistance
• Amount increased to US$ 100 000 for the
requests to be examined by the Bureau,
because:
States used to give priority to the Representative
List, rather than International Assistance, when
having to choose within the ceiling of files;
States lack human and financial resources to
develop international assistance requests that
adequately meet the eligibility criteria.
• New area for improvement – requesting for
services under international assistance
mechanism
15. 15
Capacity-building - most
important
• Long-term engagement with states to create
institutional and professional environments for
safeguarding ICH
• Activities in more than 70 countries since 2011
• 5 priorities:
Redesign of institutional infrastructures
Revision of cultural and other policies and
legislation
Development of inventory methods
Development of effective safeguarding measures
Participation in international cooperation
mechanisms
• Content and training materials + network of trained
expert facilitators
16. 16
Funding of capacity building in
South-East Europe
• Sofia C2C centre’s support is much appreciated, as no
other donor in the region for the time being
• Cooperation with European Union with a view to start
long-term and sustainable capacity building for ICH
safeguarding:
• Safeguarding ICH is not one of the priorities for EU
• The voice of potential beneficiary countries is
important in their negotiations with EU bodies
• Through international assistance
• By funds coming from countries’ themselves
18. 18
1972 Convention 2003 Convention
Focus Conservation of natural
and cultural heritage
properties
Safeguarding of intangible
cultural heritage elements
Nature Cultural and/or natural Cultural and/or social
Link to
Development
Heritage as fundamental
to sustainable
development
Cultural heritage as a
mainspring of cultural diversity,
an important vector for
sustainable development
Major
Stakeholders
Enhanced role of
communities (strategic
objectives 5Cs)
Communities and individuals
maintaining living intangible
heritage
Similarities in
domains…
Cultural landscapes Cultural spaces
Differences & similarities
19. 19
World Heritage
• World Heritage
List
• List of WH Sites in Danger
• WH Committee identifies sites in
serious danger
• To encourage corrective action
Intangible Cultural Heritage
• Representative List
• Register of Best Safeguarding
Practices
• Urgent Safeguarding
• Identified and nominated by State
Parties
• To mobilize assistance
Mechanisms
20. 20
World Heritage
• Outstanding Universal Values
(OUV) decided by authorities and
experts in consultation with
stakeholders
• Comparison of value between
sites; site must fill a gap on the
World Heritage List as best
exemplar or representative within
its geo-cultural region/globally
Intangible Cultural Heritage
• Significance to communities,
and decided by communities
• No comparison of value among
ICH elements
• ICH changes over time
Core concepts
21. 21
World Heritage
• Integrity: wholeness and
intactness of site, no impact on
OUV from development/neglect
• Authenticity to be protected: OUV
is truthfully and credibly expressed
through form and design, materials
and substance, spirit and feeling,
etc.
• Evolution from the Venice Charter
(1964) to the Nara Document on
Authenticity (1994)
Intangible Cultural Heritage
• ICH can evolve but should not be
divorced from its social context.
• Viability to be safeguarded:
keeping the transmission and
healthy changes of the practices
to next generations >> continued
practice / “Living Heritage”
Core Concepts
22. 22
In some cases, Intangible Heritage is
one of the contributing factors
that determines the
Outstanding Universal Value
of the World Heritage site.
Criterion (vi):
be directly or tangibly associated with events or living
traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and
literary works of outstanding universal significance
e.g. Hiroshima Peace Memorial, Auschwitz Birkenau…
22