Presented at the 14th OECD WGI Meeting, on November 2-3 2020

1. My analysis to the survey
 Well captured the features of Asia-Pacific region on the
progress of Water Governance.
 Pointed items such as level and efficiency of implementation,
gaps of human resources and funding, necessity of integrity
practices and tools, and introduction of trade-off and
economic instruments to be considered.
 These pointed items help all players including
government, international organizations, civil
societies, private sectors and NGOs to improve
the progress of Water Governance in the region.

2. My recommendations
 To add value to the documents of OECD and be well received
to Asia, more focused on ‘Water-related Disaster’, especially
flood.
 More citing from “Applying the OECD Principles on
Water Governance to Floods” issued on June , 2019
by OECD and High-level Experts and Leaders Panel
on Water and Disasters (HELP) documents.
 Considering ‘Yangon Declaration’ issued at the 3rd Asia-Pacific
Water Summit on December, 2017.
(Double investment at the regional level in infrastructure and community-based efforts to
address water-related disasters and signif-icantly increase water security)

3. Filling gaps
 Capacity development at all levels
 Network to share common information and get
consensus to be developed vertically and horizontally
I’ve established and strengthened the regional communication
network to fill some part of the gaps among regional players
through river and dams.
My current activities on Water Governance